Originally Posted by
Ralph
I've spent a fair number of years filming fish and people fishing from an underwater viewpoint (in many different situations - fresh and salt). Both mono and fluoro are easy to see, even in fine tippets, and neither is more or less visible than the other. In our classes we toss mono and fluoro into an aquarium and have the students guess which is which. Nobody can see a difference. In regards to stiffness, abrasion resistance, elasticity, flashiness, etc., all those variables are controlled in the manufacturing process and neither is inherently different than the other. Fluoro does sink a bit quicker than mono of the same diameter, but the fly has a lot more to due with floatation than the leader.
Out of curiosity I have used many brands of both mono and fluoro and never found the results to weigh in one corner or the other. Simply for the environmental and cost reasons stated above I don't use fluoro. In my humble opinion, the best tippet on the market today is Stroft. VERY consistent diameter and breaking strength. Perfect amount of stretch. It seems to be the material of choice among the Euro fishing teams who are really anal about this kind of thing (but they also use fluoro!).
Good 'nuff for me... although I do like Orvis Super Strong. Never bought into the, "invisible under water" claim anyway.
fly: Very light artificial fly fishing lure of which there are two types: the dry fly which isn't supposed to sink the way it just did; and the wet fly, which shouldn't be floating up on the surface like that. An Angler's Dictionary.
Bookmarks