Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 48

Thread: Fluorocarbon tippet or not?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Posts
    685

    Default

    I think I catch lots more fish with fluro in certain situations. I fish some very clear streams here during the egg drop and if I fish with mono, I do not catch many fish. put fluro on and its like turning a switch on. In murky waters no difference.

    In the salt, I use fluro. I think it makes a difference on the flats in shallow clear water. I also like the abrasion resistance with the heavy bite I use for tarpon. Plus with fluro you can straighten it right off the spool, but with mono you can't.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    the Lost Sierra
    Posts
    750

    Default

    I've spent a fair number of years filming fish and people fishing from an underwater viewpoint (in many different situations - fresh and salt). Both mono and fluoro are easy to see, even in fine tippets, and neither is more or less visible than the other. In our classes we toss mono and fluoro into an aquarium and have the students guess which is which. Nobody can see a difference. In regards to stiffness, abrasion resistance, elasticity, flashiness, etc., all those variables are controlled in the manufacturing process and neither is inherently different than the other. Fluoro does sink a bit quicker than mono of the same diameter, but the fly has a lot more to due with floatation than the leader.

    Out of curiosity I have used many brands of both mono and fluoro and never found the results to weigh in one corner or the other. Simply for the environmental and cost reasons stated above I don't use fluoro. In my humble opinion, the best tippet on the market today is Stroft. VERY consistent diameter and breaking strength. Perfect amount of stretch. It seems to be the material of choice among the Euro fishing teams who are really anal about this kind of thing (but they also use fluoro!).

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Roseville, CA
    Posts
    688

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph View Post
    I've spent a fair number of years filming fish and people fishing from an underwater viewpoint (in many different situations - fresh and salt). Both mono and fluoro are easy to see, even in fine tippets, and neither is more or less visible than the other. In our classes we toss mono and fluoro into an aquarium and have the students guess which is which. Nobody can see a difference. In regards to stiffness, abrasion resistance, elasticity, flashiness, etc., all those variables are controlled in the manufacturing process and neither is inherently different than the other. Fluoro does sink a bit quicker than mono of the same diameter, but the fly has a lot more to due with floatation than the leader.

    Out of curiosity I have used many brands of both mono and fluoro and never found the results to weigh in one corner or the other. Simply for the environmental and cost reasons stated above I don't use fluoro. In my humble opinion, the best tippet on the market today is Stroft. VERY consistent diameter and breaking strength. Perfect amount of stretch. It seems to be the material of choice among the Euro fishing teams who are really anal about this kind of thing (but they also use fluoro!).
    Good 'nuff for me... although I do like Orvis Super Strong. Never bought into the, "invisible under water" claim anyway.
    fly: Very light artificial fly fishing lure of which there are two types: the dry fly which isn't supposed to sink the way it just did; and the wet fly, which shouldn't be floating up on the surface like that. An Angler's Dictionary.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Porterville
    Posts
    427

    Default My two Scents (Sp)

    It occurs to me that we are trying to make invisible a line that must appear to fish a hawser. I mean these guys can spot a 22 BWO in a swift river and discern all sorts of tidbits about it. The venerable Ed Zern wrote an interesting and entertaining take on this very subject in "To Hell With Fishing."

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    the Lost Sierra
    Posts
    750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinterrunRon View Post
    Good 'nuff for me... although I do like Orvis Super Strong. Never bought into the, "invisible under water" claim anyway.
    Orvis SSS is AWESOME! If I had to guess, SSS and Stroft come out of the same mill.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Sierra Vista, Arizona
    Posts
    158

    Default

    As to the question about knotting flouro to mono, I've found that these knots do not hold. I've heard that the flouro can actually cut through the mono. I now use tippet rings if I'm tying a flouro tippet to a mono leader, so with each line tied to opposite sides of the small ring, my knots hold.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sebastian, FL, USA, Earth
    Posts
    23,981

    Default

    Big piles of mono on the river banks and in the rivers are from spin fishermen, not fly fishers.

    Anyone dispute this?

    **If those big wades of mono were FC and from fly fishers I would be rich.
    Bill Kiene (Boca Grande)

    567 Barber Street
    Sebastian, Florida 32958

    Fly Fishing Travel Consultant
    Certified FFF Casting Instructor

    Email: billkiene63@gmail.com
    Cell: 530/753-5267
    Web: www.billkiene.com

    Contact me for any reason........
    ______________________________________

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sebastian, FL, USA, Earth
    Posts
    23,981

    Default

    FC doesn't rot or degrade over time. If it does, it is very slowly.

    That is why I use it. Got tired of throwing away spools of old mono.

    I don't throw my FC into the waterways.
    Bill Kiene (Boca Grande)

    567 Barber Street
    Sebastian, Florida 32958

    Fly Fishing Travel Consultant
    Certified FFF Casting Instructor

    Email: billkiene63@gmail.com
    Cell: 530/753-5267
    Web: www.billkiene.com

    Contact me for any reason........
    ______________________________________

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sebastian, FL, USA, Earth
    Posts
    23,981

    Default

    We don't promote FC in our shop but we have it for those who want it.

    **Kind of like religion, you have to have faith first.
    Bill Kiene (Boca Grande)

    567 Barber Street
    Sebastian, Florida 32958

    Fly Fishing Travel Consultant
    Certified FFF Casting Instructor

    Email: billkiene63@gmail.com
    Cell: 530/753-5267
    Web: www.billkiene.com

    Contact me for any reason........
    ______________________________________

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sebastian, FL, USA, Earth
    Posts
    23,981

    Default

    I believe that FC sinks faster than nylon based mono.

    **Hal Janssen uses it on his 25 to 30 foot hand tied leaders on the end of a floating line so they will sink faster.
    Bill Kiene (Boca Grande)

    567 Barber Street
    Sebastian, Florida 32958

    Fly Fishing Travel Consultant
    Certified FFF Casting Instructor

    Email: billkiene63@gmail.com
    Cell: 530/753-5267
    Web: www.billkiene.com

    Contact me for any reason........
    ______________________________________

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •