Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: American river salmon restoration

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Granite Bay
    Posts
    165

    Default

    We all feel it....the American river gets better every year and I'm sure Bill can confirm it. If it wasn't for projects like these there would no fish in the river.........................

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Shatanistan
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Kiene semi-retired View Post
    Old timers I knew well from the greatest Generation who fish the American river before the dams said the Fall King salmon use to spawn

    where Lake Natomas is now.

    Also I thought King salmon like larger rocks to spawn in?
    The fall run would have historically spawned where Natomas and Folsom Lakes are now. The more abundant spring-run (at the time) would have spawned in the forks of the American up to elevations between 4000-5000 ft.

    Chinook generally make redds in fist-sized and smaller gravel.
    Quote Originally Posted by Darian View Post
    Seems like there's an opportunity to prove these projects are having the desired affect this year. From the report in the link provided by Mark, "The project produced a record number of salmon redds—underwater depressions or “nests” created by female salmon to lay their eggs. In 2018, there were zero redds counted in the area. By fall 2019, the area was teaming with redds—more than 1,000."

    Since Salmon generally return 3 years after spawning and there was a good spawn (as indicated in the above statement), there should be a good return this year (assuming ocean conditions are supportive).
    One adult return metric I've used in the past is the proportion of redds over time in the footprints of these projects. You should have pre- and post-construction data so seeing an increase of the proportion of redds could signify the benefits of a project. However, adult metrics are not ideal because salmonid life history is so complex and much of it is dependent on things we can't control (ocean conditions, Delta conditions, etc.). You could create ideal conditions in the river for juveniles and then they immediately die in the Delta or ocean. Standardizing juvenile outmigrants to some form of adult escapement is probably the best metric to use. Juvenile outmigration is really the only thing we have influence over to judge the efficacy of restoration.
    “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”
    ― Issac Asimov

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    The OV
    Posts
    490

    Default

    Does anyone know where, specifically, the project is being done? I’m assuming it’s the riffle straight south of Effie Yeaw?

    I’ll reserve judgement on it. I don’t think every project has been wrongheaded - had they added some protections for the work done at Sailor Bar, for example, I think it could have been beneficial to steelhead. Unfortunately, the spawning channel and main river are open throughout the spawning season, so ultimately it simply made fishing the redds easier for those who participate in such activities.

    A number of the others seem to have been a waste of time and money. And mogaru, I’m not sure which American you’re referring to, but the one here in Sacramento has plummeted over the last 20 years, especially the winter run. The whole west coast has, but to my eyes the American has fared far worse than the average.

    If anyone has more specific details than what was in the link, I’d like to see what they are.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Default Project Success??

    Fishtopher,.... Just to clarify my understanding, please define the term adult escapement.

    With respect, if I understand what you've said about determining the efficacy of these type projects correctly, project managers don't consider the end result (return) in measuring the success of the project but isn't the increase in spawning redds in a project area an indicator of increased returns?? Hmmm,.... Maybe I answered my own question. Apparently, returns are counted as spawning redds.
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Shatanistan
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hwchubb View Post
    Does anyone know where, specifically, the project is being done? I’m assuming it’s the riffle straight south of Effie Yeaw?
    There is a map on the project fact sheet in the original link. Project is directly across from the nature center.

    Quote Originally Posted by Darian View Post
    Fishtopher,.... Just to clarify my understanding, please define the term adult escapement.
    I use adult escapement to refer to any metric that use fish that have escaped the fishery whether it be in the river or in the ocean (i.e. had the opportunity to spawn). A bunch of different metrics can be used to determine escapement: weir counts, carcass counts, redd counts, etc. All are estimates of true population size.

    Quote Originally Posted by Darian View Post
    With respect, if I understand what you've said about determining the efficacy of these type projects correctly, project managers don't consider the end result (return) in measuring the success of the project but isn't the increase in spawning redds in a project area an indicator of increased returns?? Hmmm,.... Maybe I answered my own question. Apparently, returns are counted as spawning redds.
    Spawning redds can definitely be an indicator of project success if that was the goal of the project. In this project, it does look like they are trying to increase spawning area via gravel augmentation. Increasing the number of redds in in area is definitely good, but the number of redds is generally highly variable from year to year (probably need a minimum of 3 brood cycles to evaluate). It also does you no good if you created all this new spawning habitat at the expense of another area.

    The bottom line is that you can add all the spawning habitat you'd like in rivers like the American but it likely won't lead to higher returns since juvenile rearing is generally the limiting factor in most regulated rivers. For example, increasing adult escapement by 1% based on the goal of 160k (CVPIA goal) only results in 1600 extra fish, whereas increasing juvenile outmigrant survival by 1% of 2 million (this number is definitely higher if you include hatchery smolts) yields 20,000 extra fish. You get way more bang for your buck by improving juvenile rearing habitat.
    “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”
    ― Issac Asimov

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Default Project Metrics

    Thanks for the info. Now I have to chew on it....
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rescue ,CA Cromberg, CA
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Fishtopher, thanks for all your info! I am no scientist but what I’ve observed after these projects is not good. I have had many conversations with guides and local fishermen that were born on this river about these restoration projects and we are all on the same page, it’s doing more damage than good. Ok the gravel is supposed to wash down river for spawning grounds, well what we’ve all noticed it’s filling in holes and has also created frog water, two places where salmon /steelhead don’t spawn. It has ruined many runs, and yes more frog water. The river gets shallower every time one these projects happen, not do to CFS but rather to infill. I have many heavy equipment operator friends that have worked on these and for how much money that gets spent on these projects, many of them have been a flop. It also seems like these open houses fly under the radar so people can’t give their thoughts and concerns. Like I said, I’m just giving my opinion on what I’ve seen go on for many moons. Scientific research and studies can always be manipulated in government entities, it all comes down to money as history shows.
    Last edited by Mark Kranhold; 08-10-2021 at 04:41 PM.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    orangevale ca.
    Posts
    319

    Default

    Greetings, Yes I agree with Mark. These restoration projects are just making the river shallow and filling in the runs. Use to be you could go down to the river and see Salmon in late August-November in the river . The last time I saw a good return was when they closed fishing for Salmon for 3-5 years I think it was. That was over 10 years ago. Since then IÂ’ve noticed a rapid decline.

    These droughts are not helping either. And the big fish kill they had at the hatchery sure didnÂ’t help. IÂ’m no fish biologist or scientist. But it doesnÂ’t take one to notice the decline of Salmon or Steelhead. IÂ’m just a fishermen.

    Fishtopher, thank you for the information. Fish on!

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Shatanistan
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Kranhold View Post
    I am no scientist but what I’ve observed after these projects is not good. I have had many conversations with guides and local fishermen that were born on this river about these restoration projects and we are all on the same page, it’s doing more damage than good.
    I keep on hearing the words 'damage' and 'failure' from guides and fishermen who 'know the river' yet they don't identify how these projects are doing this. Rivers are supposed to be dynamic, some holes change and fill in, new ones are created. We've stopped this process on most of our rivers with the advent of dams. Take a look at the changes that happen annually on Eel, Mad, or the Smith. These changes used to happen on the valley rivers too.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Kranhold View Post
    Ok the gravel is supposed to wash down river for spawning grounds, well what we’ve all noticed it’s filling in holes and has also created frog water, two places where salmon /steelhead don’t spawn. It has ruined many runs, and yes more frog water. The river gets shallower every time one these projects happen, not do to CFS but rather to infill.
    I know I've said this before but I'll say it again. We are not spawning habitat limited on the American. Salmonids have plenty of spaces to spawn, the American River alone could probably support in excess of 100k spawning salmon (this doesn't mean that it can support the number of juveniles produced though). Filling in holes and creating frog water (which is a stretch) is not a barrier to the recovery of salmonids and plays no role in the number of returning fish.

    A wide, shallow river that is highly alluvial with multiple channels is exactly what the goal of these projects are. Floodplains are absolutely critical to juvenile salmonids. The Yolo Bypass floodplain study, which has been highly touted on this forum, is a perfect example of this. Floodplains are one of the most productive ecosystems on earth. Loss of floodplain habitat is one of the most important factors in the decline of salmonids in the Central Valley.

    I agree that sometimes these changes are not conducive to fishing. My opinion is that guides and fishermen have their 'spots' and refuse to adapt to changing conditions. The fish are still there, just maybe not in the same spots they were previously. One of my favorite steelhead streams in Alaska is unrecognizable from year to year due to annual snowmelt, yet I still do not have any trouble catching fish out of there. Half of the fun is finding the good spots every year.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Kranhold View Post
    Scientific research and studies can always be manipulated in government entities, it all comes down to money as history shows.
    Rather than spreading conspiracy theories about the manipulation of science in stream restoration, why don't you reach out to the scientists and entities responsible for these projects? You'll find most of them care deeply about fish and many are passionate about the rivers they work on. These projects take up a miniscule amount of funding for DWR and Reclamation. No one is getting rich doing stream restoration or working in fisheries for that matter.
    “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”
    ― Issac Asimov

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Granite Bay
    Posts
    165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hwchubb View Post
    Does anyone know where, specifically, the project is being done? I’m assuming it’s the riffle straight south of Effie Yeaw?

    I’ll reserve judgement on it. I don’t think every project has been wrongheaded - had they added some protections for the work done at Sailor Bar, for example, I think it could have been beneficial to steelhead. Unfortunately, the spawning channel and main river are open throughout the spawning season, so ultimately it simply made fishing the redds easier for those who participate in such activities.

    A number of the others seem to have been a waste of time and money. And mogaru, I’m not sure which American you’re referring to, but the one here in Sacramento has plummeted over the last 20 years, especially the winter run. The whole west coast has, but to my eyes the American has fared far worse than the average.

    If anyone has more specific details than what was in the link, I’d like to see what they are.
    I was just being sarcastic. I remember fishing in the early 90's and salmon were plentiful. There were so many you could smell the dead ones from the parking lot. Sad state of affairs compared with what we have right now.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •