Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Hydro Power Generaation....

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Default Hydro Power Generaation....

    Should hydro power generation (dams, etc.) be classified as renewable energy??? Something to consider. Follow the link for a thought provoking article:

    https://calmatters.org/commentary/my...eNjlop66E9EXdM

    The decision to stop constructing or remove dams after they've been constructed is not an easy one. Lots of questions are involved and most have little to do with environmental issues even though environmental investigation/reports are required. Since all available water in this state has long been over committed, water is a commodity for sale. Development will increase over time (witness the governors goal to build 500,000 new affordable homes) and the current drive to house the state's homeless population. As a result demand for water/power generated by dams to supply those and other new developments will increase.
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sebastian, FL, USA, Earth
    Posts
    23,837

    Default

    I think we need to be constantly evolving solar, wind and battery storage but right now it is just not there yet.

    Why did we get away from Hydro?

    Some other countries are looking at Nuclear again......



    If we are going to have more fires every summer some might think of moving from California?

    The heat in the summer and the air quality already sucks in the Valley........my entire life.


    Some are looking at being south in the winter (FL/TX) and north in the summer (ID/MT)?

    Then you have good weather and good fishing year round.
    Bill Kiene (Boca Grande)

    567 Barber Street
    Sebastian, Florida 32958

    Fly Fishing Travel Consultant
    Certified FFF Casting Instructor

    Email: billkiene63@gmail.com
    Cell: 530/753-5267
    Web: www.billkiene.com

    Contact me for any reason........
    ______________________________________

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Garden Valley
    Posts
    1,076

    Default

    Hmmm, I don’t know about thought provoking. The article seemed to be deliberately misleading in several areas, or at the very least incomplete. For one thing, the continued assertion that Hydropower is “clean” isn’t really accurate at all. While it may be “clean” in the sense that the actual releasing of water through turbines doesn’t have the emissions that gas and coal plants generate; the construction of dams has severe and long lasting negative impacts. We definitely have an energy crisis, and a water crisis, and both will be put to further stress as the population grows (not to mention the increasing impacts of climate change). I am afraid that more and bigger dams will be considered the low hanging fruit to address the issue, but that’s hardly the most ideal solution in my mind. There is no free lunch here, our consumptive culture has impacts; as population increases, we really need to reassess our levels of consumption.

    It was a big gap that there was zero mention about the level of energy consumption, and ways to be more sustainable and responsible users. Same with water consumption. That should be the first area to address in my opinion. A penny saved is a penny earned. Wind and solar technologies are already there, and have been for a while. The storage issue is the big limiting factor there, but even with the inefficiencies of current storage technologies it could still play a bigger role going forward. I think we are making progress in terms of how much of a role renewable energies play in our energy demands, but hopefully they will play a much more substantial role before we start building new dams.
    "Lord help me to be the person my dog thinks I am"
    - unknown

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sebastian, FL, USA, Earth
    Posts
    23,837

    Default

    I personally talked to a customer with the Federal Energy Commission and he said we were about 30 years out on 100% renewables

    like wind and solar......he said the battery storage was the weak link.

    https://www.utilitydive.com/news/why...y-2050/560918/


    I would love it to be practical right now.........
    Bill Kiene (Boca Grande)

    567 Barber Street
    Sebastian, Florida 32958

    Fly Fishing Travel Consultant
    Certified FFF Casting Instructor

    Email: billkiene63@gmail.com
    Cell: 530/753-5267
    Web: www.billkiene.com

    Contact me for any reason........
    ______________________________________

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Default The Article....

    After re-reading my post, I may have lead everyone astray. The. article was written by a politician and I jumped from posing the question to making a brief discussion of dams. The original question was, should hydro power generation be classified as renewable?? it's a basic question. All we're talking about is whether to change the classification of hydro generation to renewable from whatever it was/is. To me, the answer is yes. The natural resources involved in power generation are air, sun and water. Each is used to generate power through a device designed to capture the natural resource it was designed to work with. Each is enduring in nature. Each has it's positives/negatives.

    In the case of wind, it's a windmill generator capturing wind energy to turn propellers. In the case of solar, it's a matter of capturing the energy of the rays of the sun to convert to power through solar-voltaic panels. In the case of hydro-power, it's either a dam or tunnels leading to a power generating station (falling water).

    In answering this question, IMO, there's no need to consider whether one method is more cost effective than the other. Nor is there a need to consider our consumptive habits or rates as those will only increase in volume and are issues for another discussion.
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Garden Valley
    Posts
    1,076

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darian View Post
    After re-reading my post, I may have lead everyone astray. The. article was written by a politician and I jumped from posing the question to making a brief discussion of dams. The original question was, should hydro power generation be classified as renewable?? it's a basic question. All we're talking about is whether to change the classification of hydro generation to renewable from whatever it was/is. To me, the answer is yes. The natural resources involved in power generation are air, sun and water. Each is used to generate power through a device designed to capture the natural resource it was designed to work with. Each is enduring in nature. Each has it's positives/negatives.

    In the case of wind, it's a windmill generator capturing wind energy to turn propellers. In the case of solar, it's a matter of capturing the energy of the rays of the sun to convert to power through solar-voltaic panels. In the case of hydro-power, it's either a dam or tunnels leading to a power generating station (falling water).

    In answering this question, IMO, there's no need to consider whether one method is more cost effective than the other. Nor is there a need to consider our consumptive habits or rates as those will only increase in volume and are issues for another discussion.
    I guess that question kind of begs a much more robust discussion of energy to my mind. As you said, there are a lot of complex issues to address. To keep it as simple as possible, I’ll say that I have always found it to be misleading when hydropower is included under “renewable energy”, because it gives a false impression about how “clean” it is as an energy source. If we are talking just purely theoretical, then yes it is technically “renewable” in the sense that more water will presumably fill those reservoirs to provide us with the fuel to generate energy. But in terms of meeting environmental goals behind renewable energy power generation, including hydroelectric with PV and Wind kind of skews those numbers to suggest something different than reality.

    Perhaps the very choice of words “renewable energy” wasn’t the best to begin with? From an environmental standpoint there are big differences between wind/PV vs Hydro, and also from a practical application perspective they are also pretty different. So whatever we call them, I see them as being distinct from one another.
    "Lord help me to be the person my dog thinks I am"
    - unknown

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Garden Valley
    Posts
    1,076

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Kiene semi-retired View Post
    I personally talked to a customer with the Federal Energy Commission and he said we were about 30 years out on 100% renewables

    like wind and solar......he said the battery storage was the weak link.

    https://www.utilitydive.com/news/why...y-2050/560918/


    I would love it to be practical right now.........
    Definitely the battery storage is the big limitation. In order to go full on 100% wind and solar, with current storage technology, it would be both cost prohibitive as well as environmentally not the best. Even with current technology we could definitely make a bigger difference in the total energy provided by clean renewable sources. In all honesty, I’m not sure if going for 100% is the best idea for any energy sources; as those last few percentage points start getting much harder to supply efficiently. Heat wave events like this last week are pretty tough to handle without massive storage. Hydropower is very effective at dealing with major energy demand spikes in such situations, but I’d hate to see more dams built as the primary means to address an overall higher energy demand. There is an older documentary called “Fuel” that proposed that ideally we should be looking to diversify our potential energy sources more and more in the future. There are some compelling merits to not putting all your eggs in one basket.
    "Lord help me to be the person my dog thinks I am"
    - unknown

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •