Brian,
Thanks for the response but you didn't answer the question, so I'll ask it again:
Let's assume you're correct, and to some degree the river is as FUBAR'd as you seem to believe that it is. How do you reconcile the fish response; specifically the stream-born Chinook response Fishtopher asked you about in post #30? How specifically would you presume to get such a huge jump in production if the project is making conditions less favorable to the fish? This would pertain to the graphic on the left which as Fishtopher pointed out is not linked to the uncertainty of marine survival but draws a direct correlation to the productivity of inland habitat.
Bookmarks