Results 1 to 10 of 71

Thread: Anybody commenting proposed trout regulations for CA?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    alameda
    Posts
    452

    Default Anybody commenting proposed trout regulations for CA?

    Anybody commenting on the new proposed trout regulations for CA?

    Statewide Regulation (section 7.0)
    Fishing districts—section 7.00(a) through (g)—for trout waters only (lakes, reservoirs, and streams that are not accessible to fish migrating from the ocean; “non-anadromous”) will be replaced by a statewide trout angling regulation. Waters that are not located in the proposed table of changes, or stated as “move to 7.pr0 statewide reg”, will have the following regulation:
    Open year-round, 5 trout bag, 10 trout possession limit, no gear restrictions.

    More info at
    https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.a...=165844&inline

    In a nutshell many changes regarding fewer gear restrictions, fewer size limits, additional rivers going year round, a change in the fishing season start and end date (Late May to Feb instead of Late April to Nov), etc...

    Regards,

    Tim C.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,765

    Default

    Tim,
    Some of the proposed changes for Crowley don't seem to make much sense
    at all; except maybe to the marina.
    Best,
    Larry S
    Sun Diego

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Default

    "....no gear restrictions."

    This change appears to eliminate fly only restrictions on those waters included in proposal. Is that how this is being read???
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sebastian, FL, USA, Earth
    Posts
    23,895

    Default

    A friend of my in the accounting department for the State of CA told me, 30 years ago, we were bankrupt?

    Most times these changes are to save money from a over spent budget.

    See if someone can find out the last time they took all the CA DF&W licensing money and put it all in the General Fund?

    .
    Bill Kiene (Boca Grande)

    567 Barber Street
    Sebastian, Florida 32958

    Fly Fishing Travel Consultant
    Certified FFF Casting Instructor

    Email: billkiene63@gmail.com
    Cell: 530/753-5267
    Web: www.billkiene.com

    Contact me for any reason........
    ______________________________________

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    East Bay
    Posts
    682

    Default

    This is probably due to the declining trend in fishing licenses purchased.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Granite Bay
    Posts
    168

    Default

    Regulations made to put more pressure on the fish............once the fish are gone, whatever times it takes somebody else will take all the water.........little by little, working hard like ants they will reach their goal.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Redding
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Here's the link for online public comment.

    https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Fishing/...ation/comments
    "Radiate, radiate, radiate far and wide as the lines of latitude and longitude on a globe."
    - John Muir

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Right Here!
    Posts
    374

    Default

    Thanks for passing along the link. I spent some time typing and letting them know what I think about these new regs. We'll see if they actually do change things as a result of public input. Time will tell...
    "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." --Jeff Lebowski

    Some pics of native salmonids: http://flyguydave.wordpress.com/

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •