Originally Posted by
McFish
Woodman; thanks for the clarifications. It is your last paragraph about end games that , I believe, worries most of us. Why should S Ca get so much of our water? They already divert so much that all our fisheries are a fraction of what they were in the 1960's. Does the owner of a patch of desert outside of Bakersfield have the right to grow almonds? I'm not wild about paying for levee protection, either. And if native species protection is to be a touchstone, then get steelhead/salmon back to at least 1960 levels before sending more water to S Ca. JMHO
Bookmarks