Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Grouse Ridge Lakes

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Santa Rosa
    Posts
    338

    Default Grouse Ridge Lakes

    According to the DFW planting info (https://map.dfg.ca.gov/fishing/), aerial planting was conducted at specific lakes in the Grouse Ridge area last year. I'm not big on pellet-eaters, but these fish do hold over in these lakes and make viable fisheries. Some in the past were planted with Kamloops and were epic until they were wiped out by bait guys.

    Anyway.....the point of my post is.......we fished Sawmill Lake a month ago. This lake was listed as being planted in 2017 with rainbows. So we expected to catch a few small rainbows along with the resident brown trout. We fished all day, and all we caught were brown trout. No signs of any rainbows at all, which I found strange.

    I'm not a conspiracy guy, but I am very skeptical when it comes to the CA DFW.

    Has anyone been into any of the lakes in the area and noticed any new fish??? Most of the lakes in that area have had very few fish the last few years. So it should be evident if any fish have been planted in the lakes the DFW claims to have planted.

    Not asking for specific lakes, but would just like to know if DFW is telling the truth.

    Thanks all,

    ~Jeff

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Garden Valley
    Posts
    1,076

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff F View Post
    According to the DFW planting info (https://map.dfg.ca.gov/fishing/), aerial planting was conducted at specific lakes in the Grouse Ridge area last year. I'm not big on pellet-eaters, but these fish do hold over in these lakes and make viable fisheries. Some in the past were planted with Kamloops and were epic until they were wiped out by bait guys.

    Anyway.....the point of my post is.......we fished Sawmill Lake a month ago. This lake was listed as being planted in 2017 with rainbows. So we expected to catch a few small rainbows along with the resident brown trout. We fished all day, and all we caught were brown trout. No signs of any rainbows at all, which I found strange.

    I'm not a conspiracy guy, but I am very skeptical when it comes to the CA DFW.

    Has anyone been into any of the lakes in the area and noticed any new fish??? Most of the lakes in that area have had very few fish the last few years. So it should be evident if any fish have been planted in the lakes the DFW claims to have planted.

    Not asking for specific lakes, but would just like to know if DFW is telling the truth.

    Thanks all,

    ~Jeff
    Maybe the browns ate a bunch of the planters?
    "Lord help me to be the person my dog thinks I am"
    - unknown

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    orangevale
    Posts
    236

    Default

    picked up a few nice rainbows in glacier last year. Were not new planters though and the bite was not on fire.

    Russell

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Norcal
    Posts
    909

    Default

    So Jeff,

    Judging from the responses, either very few people are fishing the Grouse Ridge area
    cuz there's no fish (and DFG didn't really plant like they said, and has diverted the funds
    to another department - that would be the conspiracy theory).

    Or it's fishing well, and people are tight lipped.

    Thinking the former. I know the Lindsey lakes get hammered...if nobody is
    catching fish there, then they obviously didn't plant. It's on the list as being
    planted last year though for both upper and lower with rainbows.

    Wish a fisheries biologist with knowledge of the area would chime in.

    Eric

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Santa Rosa
    Posts
    338

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EricO View Post
    So Jeff,

    Judging from the responses, either very few people are fishing the Grouse Ridge area
    cuz there's no fish (and DFG didn't really plant like they said, and has diverted the funds
    to another department - that would be the conspiracy theory).

    Or it's fishing well, and people are tight lipped.

    Thinking the former. I know the Lindsey lakes get hammered...if nobody is
    catching fish there, then they obviously didn't plant. It's on the list as being
    planted last year though for both upper and lower with rainbows.

    Wish a fisheries biologist with knowledge of the area would chime in.

    Eric
    Well, I wouldn't expect those lakes to be fishing well if they planted them last year. The fish would still be relatively small due to them being fingerlings when planted.

    I don't think anyone is fishing there, since most of those lakes have become basically fishless over the last few years. I guess only time will tell.

    It wouldn't surprise me one bit if DFW lied about planting those lakes and diverted funds to something else. I guess the only way to find out is to hit a few lakes they say they planted and see what happens. Which is what I'm gonna do. It's not like you can get any information from DFW to verify planting. They treat this shit like they're the freaking CIA.

    Most of those lakes have good calibeatis populations and damsels too. So if fish were planted, they will holdover and become quality fish, like in years past.

    Lindsey Lakes could actually be planted with a truck, so that's probably not a good indicator. We need to know the status of the hike-to lakes which would receive aerial plants.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •