For swinging for Steelhead...is flourocarbon really any better than mono? There are conflicting articles as to if flourocarbon is really significantly less visible to fish, especially in moving water that is not crystal clear.
My problem with flourocarbon is that knot strength is not as good as mono-- not so much when tied, but after casting and fishing a short while... seems to me that fly casting puts a different stress on knots than does bait casting. If I have to use a stronger flourocarbon to compensate for knot failure is 10lb flourocarbon really clearer than an 8lb mono?
I do not have a lot of failure line to line, almost all of the failure using Flourocarbon seems to be line to hook if I use any traditional terminal knots like Clinch Knot, Improved Clinch Knot or Trielene Knot-- so I now use:
1) Lefty Kreg Non Slip Loop knot for line to hook for most trout flies (thanks to John Baiocchi).
2) Shaw Grigsby "Double Pitzen Knot" ("Best Flourocarbon Knot") for larger flies - strongest I have found, but bulky.
Per suggestions from flourocarbon manufacturers, I even use lip balm instead of saliva before I tighten the knots down (use sunscreen lip balm on my lips and rub the line between my lips before tightening the knot)
Bookmarks