Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Sac Bee article " Anglers calling for emergency closure of American River to fishing"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    East Bay, California
    Posts
    92

    Default Sac Bee article " Anglers calling for emergency closure of American River to fishing"


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SacOfTomatoes, CA, USA
    Posts
    964

    Default

    This state is such a joke. Yet the aqueduct going down to SoCal is full to the brim!!!! Oh I know how about this be a lesson why the hell SoCal needs to come up with its own idea for water and that dry spells happen regardless and that NorCal will not always be there to sustain the water needs for SoCal!

    Imagine if we had the dam piece of crap delta pipes put in already it would destroy the delta or what ever is left of it! I agree to a river closure if water has to go lower. It just sucks knowing the reason why we get to where we are at! And that we have to suffer here in the upper part of the state! Damn greed and money and people that do not seem to know crap and are politicians!


    But anyways thanks for the post Jeannie.
    Aron-



    "I own a time machine, but it only moves forward at regular speed..."

    "So many rivers to fish so little time!"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rescue ,CA Cromberg, CA
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Hah! To avoid salmon eggs that have already spawned! Sorry but the majority of those redds are dead and dry on the banks of the creek now ! What a way to start out a article, sounds like they don't know there head from there ...! It is sad but I sure hope anglers that are fishing ,fish with true etiquette of the sport of steelheading.
    Last edited by Mark Kranhold; 01-13-2014 at 06:55 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Berkeley CA
    Posts
    164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winxp_man View Post
    This state is such a joke. Yet the aqueduct going down to SoCal is full to the brim!!!! Oh I know how about this be a lesson why the hell SoCal needs to come up with its own idea for water and that dry spells happen regardless and that NorCal will not always be there to sustain the water needs for SoCal!

    Imagine if we had the dam piece of crap delta pipes put in already it would destroy the delta or what ever is left of it! I agree to a river closure if water has to go lower. It just sucks knowing the reason why we get to where we are at! And that we have to suffer here in the upper part of the state! Damn greed and money and people that do not seem to know crap and are politicians!


    But anyways thanks for the post Jeannie.
    I found this - what you said, in pictures: http://www.fishwithjd.com/2014/01/05...-bone-dry-wtf/

    Jim

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    East Bay, California
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Thanks guys! I agree with you! Jim, I saw that same article with the photos. It's all about money, politics more money and selling water and a whole bunch of people that could care less about the fish and any of the rivers. They have plenty of water down south! How about the politicians get together with Hollywood and purge their pocketbooks and build some desalinization plants!!
    If they close the river to fishing are they going to close it to those who teach fly casting on the river too...........? I hope not! Most of the salmon have already spawned and most of the fishermen and fisherwomen know how to recognize the reds and they stay off of them. Maybe if the DWR wouldn't have sent so much water earlier last year there would be more water now!! Gee what a concept!! I have been really suspicious of the timing on the water releases all last year. Seems like nothing the DWR has been doing makes any good sense!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Benicia, Ca
    Posts
    134

    Default

    I think it is going to be a bad year. That high pressure system has been sitting in the NW pacific for 13 months, it is 4 miles high and 2000 miles long. That is why the east coast got our rain and snow. This could be worse than '76.
    Last edited by Black Cloud; 01-14-2014 at 10:00 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    76

    Default

    I remember '76, I was farming back then; we had to sink some wells and pump the acquirer to stay in business. It completely changed the face of farming as our water deliveries from our district have been curtailed since then and never restored to the pre '76 levels.

    CA has some really scary data on droughts lasting decades in its past. We maybe heading into one at this time. There are theories that the cycle of a few years of drought and then wet are precursors to droughts that can last decades.

    Of course this could all change and we could get deluged in March, April and May! This is really hard stuff to predict!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Granite Bay, CA
    Posts
    506

    Default

    Here's some technical National Weather Service talk on the aforementioned drought potential from today's forecast discussion :

    "Sounding like a broken record...but just no signs of a significant
    pattern change to warrant excitement about rain for Norcal. The only
    records we are breaking are the occasional max temp records...and
    adding to the consecutive days of no rain during the rainy season
    for DTS...now up to 39 days which is 4th all time with the record of
    44 days back in 1976...which we seem destined to tie/break early
    next week. BTW...1976 was also characterized by a persistent west
    coast ridge during the cool (negative) phase of the PDO
    ."

    The "negative phase of the PDO" can last decades:

    "PDO:
    Pacific Decadal Oscillation - a recently described pattern of climate variation similar to ENSO though on a timescale of decades and not seasons. It is characterized by SST anomalies of one sign in the north-central Pacific and SST anomalies of another sign to the north and east near the Aleutians and the Gulf of Alaska. It primarily affects weather patterns and sea surface temperatures in the Pacific Northwest, Alaska, and northern Pacific Islands. Two main characteristics distinguish PDO from El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO): first, 20th century PDO "events" persisted for 20-to-30 years, while typical ENSO events persisted for 6 to 18 months; second, the climatic fingerprints of the PDO are most visible in the North Pacific/North American sector, while secondary signatures exist in the tropics- the opposite is true for ENSO. Several independent studies found evidence of just two full PDO cycles in the past century: cool" PDO regimes prevailed from 1890-1924 and again from 1947-1976, while "warm" PDO regimes dominated from 1925-1946 and from 1977 through (at least) the mid-1990's. Causes for the PDO are not currently known. Likewise, the potential predictability for this climate oscillation are not known."

    You can get the forecast discussions here: http://forecast.weather.gov/product....n=1&glossary=1

    You can also get long-term precipitation forecasts from Accuweather here: http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/sac...627?view=table

    ...unfortunately, it shows only 2.1" of liquid through February (at one point, it was showing 12" over a 10-day stretch in February).
    TroutSource.com
    we deliver the river

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    167

    Default

    Well that was a cheery read.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    NorCAL
    Posts
    127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeannie W. View Post
    Thanks guys! I agree with you! Jim, I saw that same article with the photos. It's all about money, politics more money and selling water and a whole bunch of people that could care less about the fish and any of the rivers. They have plenty of water down south! How about the politicians get together with Hollywood and purge their pocketbooks and build some desalinization plants!!
    If they close the river to fishing are they going to close it to those who teach fly casting on the river too...........? I hope not! Most of the salmon have already spawned and most of the fishermen and fisherwomen know how to recognize the reds and they stay off of them. Maybe if the DWR wouldn't have sent so much water earlier last year there would be more water now!! Gee what a concept!! I have been really suspicious of the timing on the water releases all last year. Seems like nothing the DWR has been doing makes any good sense!
    I am surprised at how many experienced anglers can't recognize a redd. Or even realize wading around them tosses up sediment that flows into the redd and helps choke out the eggs suspended in the gravel bed. I used to fish somewhat responsibly around salmon redds for trout and egg eater steelhead but I gave that up. Long casts and dont get greedy wading too close but people cant control themselves. Close the spawning water.

    I saw more than once guides on the Sac in 2002 using motor wash to stir up the redds and then drift into fish biting like crazy. The guide I was with would slingshot lead split shot at the side of those boats.
    Last edited by Walter; 01-16-2014 at 12:42 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •