Originally Posted by
left field
The dirty little not-so-secret about catch-and-release is that fish die despite our best efforts. It bothers the hell out of me when I keep a fish in the water, take my time to revive it and watch it swim away only to find it belly up an hour later down river. More often than not it is a fish I could have legally kept which would have been a better ending than dinner for crayfish. But I accept that result as I know there's a healthy self-sustaining population of trout in the rivers I fish.
I too am a bit surprised to read that. It's worded in such a way that implies it's happened at least a few times to you? I'm thinking of all the fish I've caught and released and I have never experienced 1 mortality, including trout that would be a lot of fish. Perhaps a few have died despite my efforts that I am not aware of, and perhaps a few may have been weakened in some way... still a VERY low percentile. I do think that "catch and release" can have some higher mortality rates depending on how one plays and handles the fish, but somehow I get the feeling that those guys in the video in question are extremely savvy in minimizing their impacts on those few fish they connect with.
The only reason I even care to address this concern is that I do think that there is some good that comes from spreading awareness of just how special these streams and their fish are. If we care to protect and promote healthy recoveries in these fisheries we will need ALL the help we can get. These guys didn't exactly out some super secret stream either; I hardly could call the Eel, or it's tribs "secret" fisheries in any way shape or form. Judging by the steady flow of boats that I usually encounter there, I'd say it's "on the map" already.
just my 2cents,
JB
"Lord help me to be the person my dog thinks I am"
- unknown
Bookmarks