Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Chips Fire threatens Butt/Caribou

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Penryn
    Posts
    413

    Default Chips Fire threatens Butt/Caribou

    I've been keeping an eye on the fire map for the Chips Fire. 42,000 acres and still going. Looks like the fire has touched the edge of the west shore in one spot on Butt Lake. I am going to miss that gorgeous forest on the west side and the shade it provides in the early evening. Looks like its also running very close to the Yellow Creek in the Humbug valley area. Damn-- another drop-dead gorgeous spot. I would not be surprised to see this one take almost the entire west side of Butt. I noticed that air tankers are "available", however not in use. They are utilizing helicopters. Do any of you forest service folks know why they aren't using the planes on this event? Seems like an easy fill-up on Almanor or at least the Chester arport is close by for phoscheck... seems like all hands should be on deck to protect this resource rich area.

    Tracy
    When all else fails, put down the pole and swim with the dog.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Question Air Tankers....

    Saw a recent TV news bit that said that the air tanker fleet CalFire uses is becoming unsafe and/or outdated. No money for overhaul/repair. They have a reduced number available for fire fighting support. It sounds like the aircraft they have are committed to supporting crews in high priority areas; with all of the fires going in populated areas around the state. The Feds have a fleet and they are supposedly in use, as well.

    The same news bit said that Calfire estimated that the Chips fire might burn until the end of August....
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Penryn
    Posts
    413

    Default Butt

    Damn, Darian, that sucks. Maybe it will reach Jonesville, butte Meadows, West Shore Almanor then??!!

    Also, this is a USFS fire, not a Cal-Fire incident. They said the planes are available, and for this depressed timber economy that now relies on tourism, this would seem like a priority area.
    When all else fails, put down the pole and swim with the dog.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Humboldt
    Posts
    249

    Default

    Voluntary evacuations for both Canyondam and West Almanor are in place. I would not be surprised if the fire raced up the canyon out of Butt up towards Almanor. It is really a shame that the fire already torched the Yellow Creek canyon.

    Also the Reading Fire in Lassen Park has done some serious damage and continues to burn. Amazing what can happen from a few smoldering trees after a lightning strike.

    A fire now burns in the Mill Creek canyon upstream from Black Rock as well.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Philbrook Lake
    Posts
    388

    Default

    the smoke has made air operations impossible. There also comes a point where air operations are just not nearly as effective as people think. For the most part air ops are great for initial attacks and slowing down a fast moving portion of the fire to allow crews on the ground to hit it hard. But they dont put out a fire. You need bare dirt line around fires. Also..fire might be just what some of that forest needs...we suppress suppress suppress..and then we get the big ones. I know the area very well where this fire is burrning...A LOT of dead and down trees.
    Last edited by huntindog; 08-17-2012 at 11:14 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Berkeley, USA
    Posts
    87

    Default

    I'm also following this closely. Official details and good maps updated several times per day here:

    http://www.inciweb.org/incident/3052/

    I understand that fire is part of the cycle of western ecosystems, but at 50-something I realize that I will not live to see this area forested again.

    Heartbreaking.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Penryn
    Posts
    413

    Default Butt

    Gotcha Huntindog, juest feel that if it's too steep to get hand crews into some of the areas with all the falling debris, why not bring out some big boys. The USFS tanker fleet capacity is apparently 30% of what it was in 2002, so I can somewhat understand. This will however hurt local economies that rely on tourism for revenue. Amazing... two unfunded wars across the pond, but no one's willing to print the money to build tankers. Ideology?
    When all else fails, put down the pole and swim with the dog.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    3,094

    Default

    My father and I fished lower Yellow Creek about 2 weeks before the fire hit. I feel very regretful that I didn't take more pictures of that beautiful area. I will miss fishing up there and I hope that I will get a chance to see that area come back to a mere resemblance of what is was before the fire.














    Yellow Creek, the meadows





    Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your limit

    Adam Grace
    Past Kiene's Staff Member

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Cool Fire as a Tool....

    I get it. Fire is not always a bad thing. It has a way of renewing forested areas. However, I don't think the people who advocate using fire in that manner anticipated fires of the magnitude we're experiencing statewide and throughout the west. Controlled burns are a valuable tool, tho.

    Not sure if it's still the case, but isn't the scorched timber harvested as salvage by logging companies (e.g. Sierra Pacific, etc.). It was reported in local news papers in the spring that a logging company in Quincy (I believe) was in a dispute over the value of a timber sale with USFS. I think the owner contended the value of the timber was overstated by USFS and it caused him to lose money. Not pointing fingers, but it seems to me that might be an incentive to allow a fire to burn as long as possible before making any great effort to control it as long as no populated areas are involved. A happy coincidence or no harm, no foul??? Who knows....

    Doesn't allowing a certain amount of downed material to rot on the ground create mulch and, ultimately, top soil??? Ashes to ashes, dust to dust so to speak....
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Philbrook Lake
    Posts
    388

    Default

    D, there is definately a fine line between "healthy fires" and destruction. Theoretically, the forest used to burn a lot more often. Ground clutter was burnt, large areas were cleared and the wildlife evolved with it. I know and work with a few wildlife managers who will flat out tell you the primary cause for the fall of our deer population is that we have taken fire out of the equation. I would fall into that camp myself. I look at the fire going on northeast of Chico right now, The Mill Fire. Frankly would love to see that one go about 200,000 acres. That is winter range deer habitat and any old timer around here will tell you how good the deer hunting was for 20 years after the last great fire went through that area (I believe it was in the 60's). It basically burnt from forest ranch to red bluff and the area is still known as "the old Chico Burn." Anyway, it is certainly a touchy subject that mixes science, with theory, with emotion. I think the area burning in the Chips fire will be just fine, I believe it will still be beautiful, and I look forward to deer hunting in Chips canyon in the next few years.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •