Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Vest or Chest Pack?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Fair Oaks
    Posts
    665

    Default Vest or Chest Pack?

    Which is better?

    I feel positively archaic at times wearing my old Orvis vest. I rarely see anyone with a vest any more. My only complaint is too many pockets to lose things temporarily. I only wear it when wading, never when drifting on the toon or on the boat. What am I missing, if anything? Recommendations?

    Thanks! ~John

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    315

    Default

    I gave up on the vest a long time ago. Now i have one of those back pack type deals with two chest pockets. Plenty of room in those pockets to hold flies, line, indicators, etc... Then the back pack part can hold a thermal, camera, water, beer and lunch.

    It's much more convenient, especially if you like to do a decent amount of hiking/fishing in a day.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    El Dorado Hills
    Posts
    3,715

    Default

    For shad and surf fishing I use a small chest pack and a small camelback for water. When creek fishing I use my fishpond chest/back pack.
    So long and thanks for all the fish!!!
    `·.¸¸.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Auburn, CA
    Posts
    610

    Default

    Vest in my tube, it's convenient and holds "everything". I use one of my Camelback's for stream fishing, nice to have lot's of water when going creekin'.
    A.K.A. Colfaxtroutman

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Santa Cruz Mountains, CA
    Posts
    200

    Default

    I was just looking around at this stuff and I ended up getting this:

    http://www.fishpondusa.com/doublehaul.cfm

    It seemed like it filled the minimalist answer as well as gotta-pack-lots-of-junk answer.

    I'll be getting it Thursday or so, I can post a review then.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Exiled to Washington, DC
    Posts
    111

    Default 'Nook Sack

    If I don't need much (shad, small streams, etc.) I use one of these:
    http://www.recycledwaders.com/pages/...p_nooksack.asp

    Big enough for a few flies, tippet and a beverage. Small enough to ensure that I don't bring too much stuff. A bead of Aquaseal along the seams and it is pretty waterproof.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Auburn, CA
    Posts
    610

    Default

    Pretty nice, but it better be for the price. I paid that much for my back packing pack and I can put a weeks worth of gear in it!

    Quote Originally Posted by luckydude View Post
    I was just looking around at this stuff and I ended up getting this:

    http://www.fishpondusa.com/doublehaul.cfm

    It seemed like it filled the minimalist answer as well as gotta-pack-lots-of-junk answer.

    I'll be getting it Thursday or so, I can post a review then.
    A.K.A. Colfaxtroutman

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Santa Cruz
    Posts
    46

    Default

    I'd keep the vest, but absolutely buy a chest pack. My old vest literally has 27 different pockets/storage spots, its like a black hole. I usually tried to keep everything in four accessible pockets, sans the license and cigar dry pocket, until I switched. The pack covers 90% percent of what I do, from the mountains to the surf, with easier use, less weight, and better range of motion. I still like having the vest if I need to bring a ton of gear, but that rarely happens.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Highlands, Ca.
    Posts
    2,220

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sammy View Post
    I gave up on the vest a long time ago. Now i have one of those back pack type deals with two chest pockets. Plenty of room in those pockets to hold flies, line, indicators, etc... Then the back pack part can hold a thermal, camera, water, beer and lunch.

    It's much more convenient, especially if you like to do a decent amount of hiking/fishing in a day.
    +1 for the reason's given and the fact that I rock hop/climb a lot and I need to see where my feet go, something you don't get with a chest pack.
    I do still like vests but the ability to carry multiple water bottles, rain gear, and dry boots for the walk out as well as some beers has got me into the aforementioned packs.

    Ed
    Elwood: It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

    Jake: Hit it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    2,934

    Default

    Ive got a vest and two chest packs. I use them both. If Im wading a small creek I prefer a fanny type pack that I can rotate to my hip to dig thru and then back out of the way. I have had too many casting/line management problems with a chest pack. I have lost a couple steelhead when my loose line jumped around my chest pack on a hard running fish.

    I mostly use my vest for all purpose fishing.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •