State Parks Funding....
So, let me see if I understand this correctly.... The State is increasing user fees by a large percentage supposedly in order to offset increased costs.
State Parks are funded by a mix of public and private moneys. Part comes from general fund, part comes from user fees and some from donations to the State Parks Foundation (also, a user fee). The balance comes from management contracts with private vendors. The tax portion apparently comes from the general fund. I don't know what the precise amount each of these sources contributes.
I know that I and many others pay their Personal Income Taxes on time and don't cheat, contribute to the State Parks Foundation and pay user fees when at a park. Seems to me that these sources should be enough at current levels to keep all the State Parks open with the exception of those least used. Why not defund those parks that fail to attract enough visitors to make them viable At this point, any fee increase may have the opposite affect than that desired as LarryS points out.
So, as the state attempts to eliminate/reduce the burden of funding operations of state parks on the General Fund, it increases user fees on all locations.... Not sure how the state can justify raising user fees without some real, documented justification (e.g. at least an annual count of users at each park).
I'm not an overly conservative type but this seems to me to be a de facto tax increase. you know, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck....
"America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."
Author unknown
Bookmarks