Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 45

Thread: Huge Oregon Steelhead

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    2,934

    Default

    So, I am extremely familiar photoshop and use it a lot for my photography. I'd like to know what in this picture leads you to believe its shopped? Jealousy??

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Auburn, CA
    Posts
    610

    Default

    I think it's called haters disease, seems to affect this section of the site more than others . That's a nice looking fish!

    Dan

    Quote Originally Posted by jbird View Post
    So, I am extremely familiar photoshop and use it a lot for my photography. I'd like to know what in this picture leads you to believe its shopped? Jealousy??

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sonoma/Lake Counties
    Posts
    1,329

    Default

    my first reaction was also photo-shopped - that otherwise looks like a record steelhead. With a fish that large and heavy I would expect his hand at the rear of the fish to make a much bigger indentation?

    If not, that is a truly magnificent fish and wild!!!

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    375

    Default

    Hard to say for sure on the Photoshop, but I'm with Rick (and others). For reference here's a smaller fish, about half the weight of the reported fish, and note the displacement of the fishes body around the hands supporting the fish. Plus, by the way the angler appears to be holding the fish near the tail, (note the hand nearest the tail is lower than the other hand), there is very little displacement.


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Exclamation Humongous....

    I'm not a photo-shop guy but I can't say I agree that the grip on that fish would cause a greater indentation in the fishs' flesh. If that fish was pickded up from the water, immediately photo'd, with muscles flexed, it may've been struggling to escape and not limp. We're guessing as to what actually happened or was photographed....

    I'd like to think that Steelhead that big can still be caught in the continental USA....
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Benicia, Ca
    Posts
    134

    Default

    No jealousy, just skeptical, the photo does not look natural for that big of a fish. A trophy that big should have a few more photos. If it is real, kudos.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rescue ,CA Cromberg, CA
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Looks like a poor quality photo, almost like a camera phone. Could it be pixelated do to camera phone, blown up, or shopped?? Any how , no matter what it is, that is still a toad. Congrats!!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Roseville, CA
    Posts
    688

    Default

    I hate to say it, but that looks fake to me. Actually, what looks fake is the image portion immediately above the fish and the guy's head. The transition from fish to river is not natural, and neither is the guy's head. Not sure what else is real or fake.

    And I agree, you catch a steelhead like that, there's going to be more that one photo floating around.

    I have pictures that show fish 15-25lbs being held and they look nothing like that. Way too rigid and no strain holding 25+lbs straight out from his body.
    Last edited by WinterrunRon; 05-03-2011 at 02:33 PM.
    fly: Very light artificial fly fishing lure of which there are two types: the dry fly which isn't supposed to sink the way it just did; and the wet fly, which shouldn't be floating up on the surface like that. An Angler's Dictionary.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    315

    Default

    That picture is not a fake. Angler has very small hands.


    It was caught with an adobe fly, on photo filament line, with editor hackle

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Philbrook Lake
    Posts
    388

    Default

    .......and they never landed on the moon

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •