Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Hope for the future ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Fair Oaks , California
    Posts
    3,406

    Default Hope for the future ?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    North Highlands, CA
    Posts
    709

    Default

    Hmmmm.... that's interesting
    - Robin

    "Yes, size does matter..."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Fair Oaks , California
    Posts
    3,406

    Default

    Here's an expanded version from today , lots more detail -

    http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.d...40323/-1/rss02

    D.~

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tracy, CA
    Posts
    3,341

    Default

    David, thanks for sharing this expanded version. Westlands reminds me of a brat that is used to getting its way but is now being told no. I don't know how you see it but I see them burning at least one of their federal bridges as a positive development.
    Last edited by Hairstacker; 11-24-2010 at 06:48 PM.
    -- Mike

    Chuck Norris has already been to Mars; that's why there are no signs of life.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Default Westlands....

    Articles on this have appeared in the SacBee and The SF Chronicle over the last two days, too. Interesting stuff but still sounds like Westlands didn't get what they wanted out of the feds, are taking their money and going home. Seems those that reported on this think it's a power play.

    As an aside (but pertinent) is the constant challenging of validity of the science involved by Westlands and the reaction of federal/state agencies in response. These agencies always seem to bow to the wishes of Westlands and Roll International, etc. I wondered why they responded that way for some time until I found an obscure federal law titled the Data Quality Act, AKA: Information Quality Act. This bit of federal legislation was added to an appropriations bill in 2001 and is two sentences in length. In essence, it allows anyone (spell that business) to challenge any scientific finding/report that they disagree with based on the quality of the data/info included and requires the authoring agency to respond by verifying it's own findings. Of course, this creates a circular, never ending process of reporting, challenging, examination and reporting, another challenge, etc., ad nauseum. I've gotta give the Devil his due here; what better way to stop government in its tracks than to create this process....
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •