Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: Snail Die Off in Lake Davis

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Penryn
    Posts
    413

    Talking Snails

    I hope they recover. They eat alto of them in the fall and winter.

    let's just hope they don't bunch of slimy, brood-stock snails.
    When all else fails, put down the pole and swim with the dog.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    reno
    Posts
    252

    Default Snail Die Off

    Well I have not received a response from CADFG regarding the letter I sent to them inquiring as to why the snails have died off in davis lake so I called today. Of course I never got through and was only able to get to Amber Rossi's voice mail. So, I left a message for her to either call me back or email me back,,,,I am still waiting to hear back and see if they have looked into it and if they have any answers.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    502

    Default

    Thanks for the update. I'm not surprised they have not responded though.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    reno
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Neither am I.


    Quote Originally Posted by michaeln View Post
    Thanks for the update. I'm not surprised they have not responded though.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sutter Co and the KMP
    Posts
    274

    Default

    1,

    I'm actually quite shocked you haven't gotten a response to this one. I've never posed a question to a DFG staffer that didn't get a response in a reasonable amount of time. Even if the response was time consuming to craft or if the staffer in question was not able to either answer my question or thought my concern was "off base". I've always gotten a response of some kind. Your original message is definitely one deserving of some kind of response IMO. I'd suggest contacting another staffer in the same office in the event that Amber may be out for a prolonged period of time and simply forgot or didn't have the chance to update her email autoresponse or voicemail.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    reno
    Posts
    252

    Default

    I emailed her on July 21 and I called yesterday Aug17 and re-sent the original email again yesterday to the email address listed. So I will give them a week or so then I may try calling the local dfg office in portola if I can find another contact there. The ph # I have is just to A Rossi's vm. so I will have to find another ph number. If anyone knows the office ph# or another contact there or another email I can send my letter to please post it. I'd like to speak to someone that is involved with Davis and not a sac office person.

    Quote Originally Posted by ycflyfisher View Post
    1,

    I'm actually quite shocked you haven't gotten a response to this one. I've never posed a question to a DFG staffer that didn't get a response in a reasonable amount of time. Even if the response was time consuming to craft or if the staffer in question was not able to either answer my question or thought my concern was "off base". I've always gotten a response of some kind. Your original message is definitely one deserving of some kind of response IMO. I'd suggest contacting another staffer in the same office in the event that Amber may be out for a prolonged period of time and simply forgot or didn't have the chance to update her email autoresponse or voicemail.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    reno
    Posts
    252

    Default

    On Thursday, August 26th, 2010 my co-worker and I sampled three
    separate portions of Lake Davis via D-ring dip net and boat
    electrofishing. The dip net samples and the rainbow trout stomach
    contents verified that there are four families of snail (Lymnaeidae,
    Planorbidae, Physidae, and Valvatidae) currently residing in the lake.
    More than likely, the snail populations are fluctuating as the lake get
    back into its normal cycles. I was able to find a paper which
    demonstrated the results of the first chemical treatment of Lake Davis
    in 1997. I have attached a link to the paper in this email. Basically,
    the paper shows a decline in snail population immediately after the 1997
    lake treatment, followed by a rise in snail population as the years
    progressed post treatment.

    http://www.dfg.ca.gov/lakedavis/docs...cInvertRpt.pdf

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    reno
    Posts
    252

    Default

    As for the fish parasites, we are aware of the situation at Lake Davis.
    We examined a number of trout from Lake Davis last year to confirm the
    identity the organisms being seen. We found light to heavy numbers of
    copepods on the fish. The majority of the fish lice we observed were of
    the genus Salmincola. There may be a few of the genus Lernaea as well.
    Common names for these copepods are “anchor worm, fish maggot” etc.
    The organisms found on these particular fish are commonly found in
    waters throughout the western United States. This organism usually does
    not affect fish health, though its appearance on fish can be
    unattractive.
    The presence of this organism on fish does not render the fish unfit
    for human consumption. It is not an internal parasite, but rather
    infects the gills, fins and flanks of susceptible species of fish. There
    are no practical treatment options available for lakes and reservoirs.

    The increased numbers of these organisms being seen this year is most
    likely due to the warming of the water and the high number of fish
    planted into Lake Davis. The organisms were already in Lake Davis.
    When Fish and Game planted the large number of trout into the lake we
    provided a large number of hosts for the parasite to live on and
    multiply from. The copepod numbers will decline with cooling water
    temperatures and decreasing fish numbers.

    Please feel free to contact me if you have any other questions.

    Sincerely,

    Amber


    Amber S. Rossi
    District Fisheries Biologist: Plumas/Sierra County
    California Department of Fish and Game
    P.O. Box 419
    Quincy, CA 95971
    Phone (530) 283-6864
    Cell (530) 520-4753
    Fax (530) 283-2938
    arossi@dfg.ca.gov

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    502

    Default

    The copepod letter is the same one they sent me and also to a guy on another board. It's a form letter, whether it be on paper or email. They aren't looking into it and are hoping it will go away.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Question Responses....

    I'm curious about why we should expect a personalized response to a number of inquiries about the same subject

    Seems to me that the info in the note addresses the questions that have been raised by posters on this BB. Snails are still in the lake but maybe in a down cycle and Copepods were already in the lake and will probably die off during periods of cold water.... Since there doesn't seem to be anything else look in too, they probably won't spend much time on it. But, I'm sure they don't hope that "....it...." will just go away.

    IMHO, the DFG response seems adequate for the questions asked whether in a form letter or not. If their response doesn't satisfy, ask a new question(s)....
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •