Actually,.... So called "facts" presented on this BB about that persons character went far beyond accusations of harassment.
IMHO, the only thing that could've happened had he attended was more name calling....
This guy can't even get any credit for participating in the joint venture by taking on the task of constructing and maintaining the "fence", regardless of his motives.
If his long term goal is to try to obtain lease rights to limit access to establish "pay to play" fishing, that's still legal and making a profit in this country is still OK, the last time I checked. After all, privatization of fishing waters is certainly nothing new. If you doubt that, check out any fishing catalogue.
Personally, I don't like private waters but there appears to be some benefit planned for fisherman in this project. Why not give it a chance to succeed before condemnation
IMHO, there's far too much emotion/suspicion involved. Those attitudes may ultimately have a negative affect on access issues coming out of it. If we're interested in working on this, we need to overlook that stuff.
P.S. Nobody likes attending meetings that turn into name calling, shouting matches.
Bookmarks