*Important* - Law Review Article Regarding the Decades Old Water Issue of Westlands

[OceanSunfish]

The link below provides the opportunity to print, read, or download the subject law review. The review provides a complete summary of the decades long shenanigans between Politician, BuRec, and Westlands.

IMO, this review pretty much sums "it" all up.

http://www.lloydgcarter.com/content/...e-lloyd-carter


The question is: Do we still need a $11 billion water bond IF the suggested 394K acres are actually retired? Another way to look at the 394K acres is to imagine "smoke stack" industries spewing out polution at pre EPA volumes. How do you justify spending all that money to support a "smoke stack" industry whereby there is no current solution to handle the untreated wastewater?! ("drain" as it is refered to)

Pay close attention to page 30, para 2 for suspected intent of Westlands going forward.

Thanks.