Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: 1000's Of Delta Fish Killed During Levee Repair

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Agua Fresca
    Posts
    628

    Default 1000's Of Delta Fish Killed During Levee Repair

    YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE VIDEO FOOTAGE FROM THE LINK BELOW!!! There was our WINTER RUN of FISH!!!! floating dead in the water....

    http://cbs13.com/local/delta.levee.dead.2.594116.html


    "striped bass, salmon, carp, bluegill and other game fish" killed.

    I found out this was near Courtland, CA. Check out where that is on Google Maps if you don't know. It's right along the fish(salmon, steelhead, striped bass) highway to the Sacramento Watershed. Wouldn't they have known better?

    Read Below

    1000's Of Delta Fish Killed During Levee Repair

    SACRAMENTO (AP) ― State and federal officials on Monday said they were investigating the death of thousands of game fish in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta after a federal agency drained the water around a protected island during a levee repair.

    Masses of fish could be seen floating in shallow water on Prospect Island, a 1,253-acre plot next to Sacramento's Deep Water Ship Channel that is administered by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

    The bureau on Monday halted drainage of the remaining water behind the levee and started removing the fish carcasses, spokesman Jeff McCracken said. He said the agency would begin adding oxygen to the water in hopes of saving some of the remaining fish.

    "When we realized how many fish were there, we quit pumping," he said. "By then, we certainly, apparently, had passed the point of causing some fish loss."

    The bureau had no estimate on the number of fish killed. Bob McDarif, owner of Cliff's Marina near the delta town of Freeport, estimated the number in the tens of thousands.

    "It's like a disaster out there," he said.

    The California Department of Fish and Game launched its own investigation Monday, focusing on how and why the fish died.

    Although the fish deaths were on federal land, the striped bass, salmon, carp, bluegill and other game fish are considered public trust assets for the state. The results will be sent to state Attorney General Jerry Brown.

    The levee under repair is around Prospect Island, which sits along the shipping channel about 20 miles southwest of Sacramento. The channel is the same stretch of water that served as a conduit for a pair of humpback whales that made an unlikely journey inland from San Francisco Bay last spring.

    In a project that began in early October, the Bureau of Reclamation plugged two breaks in the 15-foot-high levee and repaired about 600 additional feet. The breaches occurred in January 2006.

    Pumping the remaining water from behind the levee was the final step.

    McCracken said the bureau received clearance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to proceed with the repairs. Fisheries officials determined heavy vegetation would make it too hard to salvage the fish, but the contractor was advised to start pumping during the lowest tide of the month, which he did, McCracken said.

    "To put nets or do things, they told us it wasn't plausible," he said. "We did instruct the contractor ... to move as many fish out of the way as possible."

    The Fish and Wildlife Service studied the potential effects of the drainage project on the delta smelt, which is protected under the California Endangered Species Act. That study showed the levee repair was likely to have no effect on the fish.

    State Fish and Game officials said they were notified about the die-off last Wednesday and were not involved in the levee project.

    "We wish they would've consulted with us beforehand," department spokesman Steve Martarano said. "We could have maybe given them some ideas on things to do."

    That could have included using sport fishing groups to help reduce the fish population before the water was drained or immediately rescue some fish. It also could have meant employing special water pumps that are less harmful to fish, he said.

    McDarif, the marina operator, was first to sound the alarm about the stranded fish and said he has been frustrated by the slow response.

    He recruited more than 100 volunteers to try to move the dying fish to the river, but he said his efforts were thwarted by federal officials.

    "If I saw some fish dying now, I would go and take them out and move them to the river," he said. "The thing is, there's all these politics, and there's no time for politics."

    The Bureau of Reclamation bought the island about 12 years ago as part of a planned Army Corps of Engineers program to restore fisheries and wildlife in the delta. Funding stalled, however, and the area was never developed.

    The bureau had planned to sell the property this winter. (Who are they going to sell this valuable fish and wildlife habitat to?)

    Furthermore from
    http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/200...6/18463695.php

    Prospect Island Update: Dead Fish Removal Begins Today

    by Dan Bacher

    Bureau of Reclamation and DFG biologists on Sunday, November 25 checked Prospect Island, where thousands of fish are dead or dying, and the DFG gave the approval to remove the fish that have died, according to Jeff McCracken, Bureau of Reclamation spokesman.

    The majority of fish appear to be striped bass, but salmon, steelhead, sturgeon, bluegill, crappie, Sacramento pike minnows and other species have also died. Endangered delta smelt could also be the victims of the fish kill.

    “We've mobilized a crew and expect to begin this first thing this morning,” said McCracken on November 26. “The DFG believes removing the fish will ‘enhance’ water quality and allow for the remaining live fish to survive. We will also pump oxygen into the pools where there are remaining fish.”

    McCracken said that Bureau of Reclamation officials, the DFG manager and biologists would meet today to determine the best way to deal with the remaining fish on the island. DD-M Crane and Rigging Company of Alameda, the same company that did the repairs to the levee, will be removing the dead fish and installing aerators in the ponds, amounting to 800 acre feet of water, that remain on the island.

    “Apparently there are natural pools there that always had native fish,” said McCracken. “DFG will let us know what the next step needs to be. We believe that the water remaining on the island is sufficient to keep the remaining fish alive once the dead fish are removed.”

    After hearing about Bureau of Reclamation plans to remove the fish and oxygenate the water, Bob McDaris, who brought the fish kill to the media and public’s attention after discovering the thousands of dead and dying fish on Prospect Island last Tuesday, was encouraged that something was finally being done about the matter.

    “I’m glad that they are removing the dead fish and are oxygenating the water,” said McDaris, owner of Cliff’s Marina in Freeport. “I still would like to go with a group of volunteers and rescue the remaining fish and put them into Miner Slough.”

    He noted that one option would be to put fish back into the slough by means of a 1-foot diameter irrigation pipe. All McDaris and his volunteers need is the authority and means of transporting these fish across a muddy wallow to be released back into the slough.

    According to McDaris, “I talked to Mary Mason, DFG warden, this morning. She told me ‘I’m not going to tell you that you can’t do the rescue.’”

    McDaris, (916) 769-8047, is on standby right now with 75 volunteers to go out and rescue any fish that are still alive. He is also willing to donate money to hire a helicopter to transport the last remaining fish.

    “All I want to do is save the fish,” emphasized McDaris.

    Meanwhile, the DFG is opening a criminal investigation into the fish kill. “We’ve taken photographs of the dead and dying fish at Prospect Island and the law enforcement branch of the DFG is now doing a criminal investigation of the matter,” said Steve Martarano, DFG public information officer. “We plan to find out if anything occurred at the island that could be considered a crime. If we determined that a crime had been committed, we would then go to the District Attorney to press charges.”

    He also said the Department was going to see it they could rescue some of the fish off the island. “We’re looking at all options,” he stated.

    and at

    http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/200...3/18463168.php


    Stunning Television Footage of Huge Delta Fish Kill/Prospect Island Update
    by Dan Bacher
    Friday Nov 23rd, 2007 6:28 PM

    View the carnage of the huge fish kill at Prospect Island on the CBS13 website. There are already thousands and thousands of dead fish... and this is just the beginning of the fish kill.

    http://cbs13.com/local/delta.levee.dead.2.594116.html



    Judging by the number of fish shown in this footage shot from a helicopter by Channel 13 TV in Sacramento, this fishery disaster could end up being comparable to or worse than the Klamath Fish Kill of 2002. The majority of visible fish are striped bass, but salmon, steelhead, sturgeon, bluegill, crappie, largemouth bass and carp are also dead or dying. There is a very real possibility that delta smelt, a fish on the verge of extinction that is supposedly "protected" by the state and federal Endangered Species Acts, will be among the victims of this fish kill that is occuring while you read this.

    Bob McDaris, Owner of Cliff's Marina, (916) 769-8047, one of the first to bring this situation to light, is on standby right now with 75 volunteers to go out and rescue any fish that are still alive. All he needs is the authority and means of transporting these fish across a muddy wallow to be released back into the river/slough system. He is also willing to donate money to hire a helicopter to transport the last remaining fish.

    "We did comprehensive sampling of the fish on the island before the levee was closed," according to Jeff McCracken, spokesman for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. "We found no smelt or salmon. It was due to the lack of threat to the threatened species that the federal fishery agencies concluded we could seal the levee at low tide. And a fish salvage for the entire 1,200 plus acre island was problematic due to the vegetation on the island which the FWS and NMFS concluded fish salvage couldn't be accommodated."

    It looks like the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service made a tragic miscalculation of the amount of fish that would be killed by repairing the levee on Prospect Island and draining it. Unfortunately, an area like Prospect Island, with abundant vegetation, cover and forage, is ideal habitat for an array of Delta fish species. Draining an area like this is very destructive, without finding a way to do a fish rescue, because the flooded island is an area where fish from throughout the Delta system congregate.

    Something needs to be done about this intolerable situation before more fish needlessly die on the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. I urge people concerned about the stranding of thousands of fish on Prospect Island to call or write to the following officials and urge the federal and state governments to do something about saving the fish:

    Ron Milligan, Operations Manager
    Central Valley Operations Office
    U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
    3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 300
    Sacramento CA 95821
    916-979-2180
    fax: 916-979-2494

    Richard B. Rogers, President
    California Fish and Game Commission
    1416 Ninth Street
    Sacramento CA 95814
    916-653-4899
    email: fgc [at] fgc.ca.gov

    Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
    State Capitol Building
    Sacramento, CA 95814
    916-445-2841

    You can call also call the Bureau of Reclamation, Public Affairs Office, 916-978-5100.

  2. #2

    Default

    I saw this when it originally aired and the vast majority of the fish looked to be non-native bass and carp. Certainly does not seem to be holding water for salmon or steelhead. Hard to get too excited about it as it seems the impact to native fisheries is minimal.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,068

    Default A DEAD FISH BY ANY OTHER NAME DOTH STENCH AS SOUR

    I saw this when it originally aired and the vast majority of the fish looked to be non-native bass and carp. Certainly does not seem to be holding water for salmon or steelhead. Hard to get too excited about it as it seems the impact to native fisheries is minimal.
    That's the exact kind of apathy our government representatives and utility commissioners depend on in order to move forward with 'business as usual'.

    In this case, It is the principal rather than the product which gravely (pardon the pun...) concerns me.

    You are correct stating that not many salmonids were killed in this event of carelessness. However, other, loftier decisions (namely, the increased water export bond measure being pushed via the ad-hoc committee; 'Coalition for a Sustainable Delta') is also backed by the Bureau of Reclamation and if it is passed it will have catastrophic effects on Chinook and Steelhead viability in our San Joaquin/Sacramento Delta system.

    Get excited!
    M


  4. #4

    Default

    I do not see how the two are equivalent. I see this fish kill as a distraction from far greater issues which we should be focusing on. This one is being propped up and gives everyone some body they can point a finger at.

    Is this sustainable delta act you are refering to the same as the periferal canal to move the water extraction point from the delta to further upstreram?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Default Sustainable Delta....

    Hi Covelo,.... The "Coalition for a Sustainable Delta" is, as I understand it, a group of agri-business/water distributors/politicians supporting the governors initiatives to "re-design" the Delta to essentially do what you've described plus more for a price tag of $10 Billion in bonds. I'm not sure which part of all of this I would oppose more.

    Of course, the Delta re-design is a water grab and the bond issue is absolute financial lunacy considering that over half of annual state revenues are budgeted for debt service on prior bond issues.... This, while facing a structural, annual budget deficit.

    As you've pointed out, moving the water extraction point upstream is associated with the peripheral canal. Not sure where that proposal is since the Governor's Blue Ribbon Committee recommended a complete re-design by establishing a cross Delta water transport system that, essentially bisects that body of water and does a lot more.

    The outcome of all of this is bad for all fishes (native or not) that use the Delta for living or migration to spawning areas.
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,068

    Default DELTA BLUES

    Mr. Menken summed it up well as I see it.

    And agreed, the two issues are separate and not equivalent.

    I was speaking against becoming complacent is all.

    Yes, the proposed peripheral canal and subsequent increase in water exports would be the far greater demise of our fisheries.

    The likelihood of a 9 billion bond issue passing with our current economy and state deficit is not likely but what concerns me is that there is also a trend towards environmental protection and many Americans might read JUST THE TITLE of the proposition on the ballot and do the 'feel good' thing of voting YES for a 'sustainable delta' instead of reading what exactly it entails.

    It would more aptly be called the 'Coalition for a Drainable Delta'...

    Hopefully people will read and not just glance at titles of the issues before them when they go to the polls.

    Meanwhile, I am writing letters and researching other ways to get more involved towards the defeat of the prop.

    Take care~
    Mark

  7. #7

    Default

    Sending more water south is definitely a bad move, but I am not so sure a peripheral canal type project would be inherently bad for the delta or rivers. Currently water is pumped out of the system at the beginning of the delta and the river flows are adjusted to make sure no salt water is pumped. This results in unseasonably high flows that screw up holding patterns and migration of species. Taking water from locations near the dams would remove the salinity issue. Lower flows on the Sac during the summer months would be closer to natural historic flow regimes. Maybe that would allow them to release more water in the early winter and fall, like now, instead of capturing it for summer releases. I believe this would be very beneficial. Of course, if they just plan to ship the water south then this discussion is moot.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    7,786

    Default Delta....

    Hmmmm,.... Tristan, I just re-read all of the posts under this thread and kinda feel like we were engaging in a fairly objective discourse from all sides.... Am I missing something or were you referring to the other threads that had so much emotionalism in them.

    You are correct, that the current fish kill is a blip on the horizon compared to the overall status of the delta and tributaries. It's a complicated mess with all kinds of related issues (economic/environmental/legal). Not easily solved without objective analysis/discussion/decisions.

    In any case, I know you have some good insights into this stuff (....even if we don't always agree).
    "America is a country which produces citizens who will cross the ocean to fight for democracy but won't cross the street to vote."

    Author unknown

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Placer County
    Posts
    1,135

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tristan
    No offense to those who are concerned about this issue. You should be rightly concerned about the health of the Delta, but seriously this chest-beating about the levee break & associated fish kill does nothing as this issue is but a small drop in a huge ocean of problems. Everyday fish are killed at the pumps or as a direct consequence of the operation of the water facilities, yet we are more worried and worked up about a couple thousand fish that died as a result of a levee repair, but not when hundreds of thousands of fish die at the pumps?

    People are treating this incident as if its some sort of isolated occurence and tragedy, expending political capital and energy by threatening lawsuits that frankly won't go anywhere.... (Even though I do think those responsible are guilty of a crime, doesn't mean you are gonna win, and you might as well save that time and $ for when it really matters.)

    In the end we don't have anyone to blame but ourselves for this situation. Its our own government and federal agency who are responsible for this mess. We voted for those in charge now. (Such as the governor, president, ect.) They have made it pretty obvious where they stand on the issues....and while I do believe Covelo made an eloquent and thoughtful post about the merits of an alternate conveyance method, I think that at this time everyone identifies the Governor's plan as the only option (which is flawed) and therefore we cannot meaninfully discuss such issues without someone crying bloody murder.

    My .02

    -Tristan
    On the contrary, I believe your post is very offensive to those that will be out there sloshing around in the muck this weekend saving the few fish that are still alive. And, also to those you refer to as "chest beating" this topic or treating it as an isolated case, etc.

    Do you think they are ignorant to the larger picture you refer to? Of course they aren't. They understand damn well what dies at the pumps every day of the year. In essence, this is why they are going out there to save those fish because any sportfish in this state should not be wasted especially under our current misguided system.

    There will be many people out there this weekend who attend DFG scoping meetings, SDIP hearings, members of fishing groups, letter writers, fund raisers, etc. Most are restless and just want to actually get out and do something where they will feel a small amount of instant satisfaction by saving a few ramaining surviving fish.

    All other comments to this thread are opinions and agendas we've heard before and certainly acceptable as such and is what gives this forum its well deserved following.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tracy, CA
    Posts
    3,341

    Default

    Tristan, although I haven't posted, I have followed the issue and this discussion with great interest. Could you please (I mean this sincerely) elaborate more on the Nature Conservancy and any of its efforts you're aware of that directly or indirectly impact the Delta? I've been curious for some time as to which environmental group is likely to provide the most bang for the buck, so to speak, and you've suggested this may be the one.
    -- Mike

    Chuck Norris has already been to Mars; that's why there are no signs of life.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •