PDA

View Full Version : Dilemma for the water contractors and those that want to build Brown's tunnels



Mike McKenzie
11-22-2013, 03:24 PM
Much discussion of late about the fact that certain folks have come to the realization that due to land subsidence from excess pumping of ground water, the "restored" San Joaquin River will have to flow up hill to get to the Ocean and now this from Restore the Delta...

Peripheral Tunnels Opponents Respond
to USGS Report on Subsidence:
Tunnels will do NOTHING to Address Threat to Valley;
Water Takers Weren't Supposed to Plant Permanent Crops

STOCKTON, CA - Restore the Delta (RTD), opponents of Gov. Brown's Peripheral Tunnels that would drain the Delta and doom salmon and other Pacific fisheries, today responded to the release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) of a report on land subsidence in the Central Valley. RTD notes that the Brown Administration's water export tunnels would do nothing to address this threat to the Central Valley.
Restore the Delta Executive Director Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla said:
"San Joaquin Valley's land subsidence is the real threat to California's water delivery system." RTD said the report shows that the Westlands and Kern Water District mega-growers are engaged in unsustainable growing of permanent crops on arid land, and that the governor's Peripheral Tunnels don't address this root cause of the state's water problem.

The San Joaquin Valley's complicated system of moving water around depends on maintaining water levels and flows in the Delta Mendota Canal and in irrigation canals. But groundwater overdraft in parts of the region is causing the land to subside and the canals to sink. One dam and canal in western Madera County are sinking six inches a year, so the dam won't be high enough for gravity to push water down the canal.

An engineering geologist with the Department of Water Resources says that two areas subsided up to a foot a year for the past four to five years. And a USGS hydrologist says the lining of the Delta Mendota Canal is actually buckling in some places. One canal has lost 50% of its capacity due to subsidence.

Yet, water rate payers are being asked to subsidize construction of the Brown Administration's peripheral tunnels so that big corporate agribusinesses in the San Joaquin Valley can prop up its unsustainable economic and environmental model.

"How can California water ratepayers be expected to pay for the construction of the Peripheral Tunnels when the state's existing water delivery infrastructure is breaking down?" said Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, Executive Director for Restore the Delta.

"Exporters have spent millions of dollars creating a public campaign that they are the victims, and that the Delta is the weak link, but these water takers were never supposed to plant permanent crops," continued Barrigan-Parrilla. "They've exhausted their own groundwater supply, and now they are coming after the Delta and upstream rivers to support farms that are not environmentally and economically sustainable. Sending them water is like enabling a drug addict. Is the state's entire water supply to be sacrificed for almonds to export to China?"

Spread this around folks, this is their true weak link in the scam being perpetrated on the taxpayers and ratepayers in California!

Mike

Darian
11-23-2013, 01:58 PM
Scary Stuff.... Keep in mind that the San Joaquin valley land has years ago been documented as having sunk 115 feet (maybe not in the same area as this event).

The system of canals/pumps, etc., supply water to more than just almond growers in the San Joaquin Valley. Unfortunately, all beneficiaries (spell that ratepayers) will have to pay for the repairs to the damaged infrastructure caused by subsidence. Maybe a better distribution of the costs with the lions share of the costs allocated to those who caused the damage problem is in order but, since almost all local governments get some or all of their water from wells, some level of costs will be born by all ratepayers....

Re-payment of costs for the proposed tunnels (BDCP) is another matter. As it now stands, the principal of beneficiary pays advanced early in the proposed project is twisted, requiring a deeper reading of info provided by several different agencies and water contractors to get an idea of what's going on.

For example, in a recent development, the volume of water (Annual acre feet) to be made available for diversion from the project was reduced to an amount below the level currently diverted. As a result, water contractors have begun to express reluctance to pay for the project. A principal from Westlands was reported to have said that there wouldn't be any reason to pay for a project that delivers an equal amount or lesser amount of water than is currently diverted. Add to that the costs of infrastructure repairs due to land subsidence and the feasibility of the BDCP doesn't sound so good.

gitt
12-08-2013, 04:32 PM
Tom Stienstra added this to the end of an article titled, "Coyotes Seemingly thrive in San Francisco". Here is the link to the full article- http://www.sfgate.com/outdoors/article/Coyotes-seemingly-thrive-in-San-Francisco-5045034.php#photo-5559718

D-Day imminent
California's recreation lakes reached their lowest levels in several years last week, and with cold, mostly dry weather marching through the state, some are talking the "D" word, as in drought. So much water has been shipped south the past two summers that water managers are putting all of their eggs in one basket, hoping that this winter will end up being a wet one and refill these lakes:

-- Bad shape: Lake Kaweah (5 percent full), Hensley (5 percent), Success (6), Eastman (9), Isabella (10), Black Butte (12), Pine Flat (17) and giant San Luis (26). You read it right. These lakes are about 90 percent empty.

-- Not good: Folsom Lake (23 percent full), McClure (24), Mendocino (25), Beardsley (28), New Hogan (30), Shasta Lake (37), Oroville (39) and New Melones (43).

-- In L.A., Pyramid Lake is 96 percent full and Castaic is at 85 percent. Funny, isn't it? Or is it?



For those that are not aware, Pyramid Lake is part of the Los Angeles Basin's water supply. Corey Cate, thanks for pointing that out.