PDA

View Full Version : North American freshwater fishes race to extinction



Bill Kiene semi-retired
08-14-2012, 10:28 AM
North American freshwater fishes race to extinction
by Staff Writers
Washington DC (SPX)
Aug 14, 2012



North American freshwater fishes are going extinct at an alarming rate compared with other species, according to an article in the September issue of BioScience. The rate of extinctions increased noticeably after 1950, although it has leveled off in the past decade. The number of extinct species has grown by 25 percent since 1989.

The article, by Noel M. Burkhead of the US Geological Survey, examines North American freshwater fish extinctions from the end of the 19th Century to 2010, when there were 1213 species in the continent, or about 9 percent of the Earth's freshwater fish diversity.

At least 57 North American species and subspecies, and 3 unique populations, have gone extinct since 1898, about 3.2 percent of the total. Freshwater species generally are known to suffer higher rates of extinction than terrestrial vertebrates.

Extinctions in fishes are mostly caused by loss of habitat and the introduction of nonindigenous species. In North America, there are more freshwater fish species in a typical drainage to the east of the Great Continental Divide than to the west, where a greater proportion of species have gone extinct or are found nowhere else.

Estimating the number of extinctions relies on scrutiny of historical records and careful estimation procedures, since the last populations of a species are often recognized as such only in hindsight-there is typically a lag of several years from the last observation of a species and its estimated year of extinction.

Estimates are complicated by the fact that, on average, 6.7 new species are discovered each year, and occasionally a species thought to have gone extinct is "rediscovered."

Nonetheless, Burkhead concludes that between 53 and 86 species of North American freshwater fishes are likely to have gone extinct by 2050, and that the rate of extinction is now at least 877 times the background extinction rate over geological time.



American Institute of Biological Sciences

.

Bill Kiene semi-retired
08-14-2012, 10:31 AM
We introduced a lot of fish here in CA.

Striped Bass
Small Mouth Bass
Large Mouth Bass
White Bass
Redeyed Bass
Spotted Bass

American Shad
Threadfin Shad

Common Carp
Grass Carp
Gold Fish

Brown Trout
Brook Trout
Kokanee
Lake Trout

Flathead Catfish
Blue Catfish
Channel Catfish

Several Talapia

Northern Pike

Pumpkinseed
Warmmouth
Bluegill
Yellow Perch
Redeared Sunfish
Green Sunfish
White Crappie
Black Crappie


http://calfish.ucdavis.edu/species/

aaron
08-14-2012, 11:12 AM
Wow I could have sworn these were native http://calfish.ucdavis.edu/species/?uid=46&ds=241

SHigSpeed
08-14-2012, 11:35 AM
Wow I could have sworn these were native http://calfish.ucdavis.edu/species/?uid=46&ds=241

LOL!!

_SHig

Jeff C.
08-14-2012, 12:11 PM
Native like the Sidewalk Salmon?

FISHEYE
08-14-2012, 04:19 PM
Bill et al., a main point of the paper is the cause of the increased rate of extinction.

Extinction is a natural process, Burkhead explained, so examining its rate over a long geological timescale provides biologists with a benchmark for comparing current extinctions to background rate. The accelerated pace of extinction observed since the beginning of the twentieth century suggests human causes.

Natural causes of fish extinction are linked to transitions in landforms and continental watercourses over time, but many twentieth century extinctions were caused by dams, channelization of rivers, water pollution, and other human-induced factors.

To quote one of my favorite cartoons "we have met the enemy and he is us."

Mike O
08-19-2012, 02:07 PM
Bill et al., a main point of the paper is the cause of the increased rate of extinction.

Extinction is a natural process, Burkhead explained, so examining its rate over a long geological timescale provides biologists with a benchmark for comparing current extinctions to background rate. The accelerated pace of extinction observed since the beginning of the twentieth century suggests human causes.

Natural causes of fish extinction are linked to transitions in landforms and continental watercourses over time, but many twentieth century extinctions were caused by dams, channelization of rivers, water pollution, and other human-induced factors.

To quote one of my favorite cartoons "we have met the enemy and he is us."

And INTRODUCED SPECIES!!!. But we tend to hide from that one, especially if the introduced species have good game qualities...or "enhance" the sporting nature of our destination of choice.

Darian
08-19-2012, 03:15 PM
Respectfully, Mike, all of the introduced/invasive species issues and problems you mention have been discussed and studied ad nauseum. The reality seems to be that we lack the will to do anything about problems we cause ourselves.

Of course, to do that we would first have to commit to funding the costs. Since it isn't really a profit making exercise, private enterprise hasn't shown much interest in taking on that responsibility. That leaves governmental and non-governmental entities to do that job. As I recall the latest business community mantra is that California's regulatory and tax environment is not business friendly and individual citizens regularly decline to pay for services they demand. So, that doesn't leave much room for reduction or removal of introduced or invasive species from the environment.

That being said, I don't agree that every introduced/invasive species is a problem but concur that there is some level of self interest here. If we are to categorize species as, for example, native or non-native, we first have to answer the question about how many generations a particular species have to survive here or are necessary to become classified as native. The current definition appears to be anything that didn't live here when the first written or oral history records were established is non-native (introduced).

All biological species tend to try to expand their territories with or without our help. Some are successful, some aren't. As the environment changes, those unable to adapt probably go extinct regardless of whether we intervene or not.

IMO, discussions or efforts about removing introduced and invasive species do nothing but distract from the real issues and problems caused by human activities/overpopulation. Far more destructive are water exploitation and/or pollution, rampant development, greed, etc., etc.

As has been said many times before, we have met the enemy and he is us. :-|

Mike O
08-19-2012, 05:22 PM
Was gonna respond, but there's no discussion with you Darian. You're right, as always.

Darian
08-19-2012, 07:49 PM
Too bad.... If you could pretend to keep it impersonal it might've made for a good exchange of ideas.... :-|