PDA

View Full Version : salmon/striper conservation on the Delta/American River/et al



STEELIES/26c3
12-06-2011, 12:34 PM
To supplement my signing other's petitions and pleas (form letters)... I decided to write a brief but more personal letter to our congress and house reps regarding the political issues we face regarding the sustainability of our Delta and its PUBLIC-TRUST resources...

Said letter was limited to 4,000 words but here it is:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I attained a Bachelor of Science degree in fisheries from Humboldt State University.

More importantly, I have fished and studied the fisheries and greater ecology of the Sacramento/San Joaquin delta ecosystem and its tributaries for the last 30 years.

I know from empirical data and factual evidence that the decline in pelagic fish species and more specifically, in endangered fish species (ie, delta smelt and Chinook salmon) is corollary with the increased volumetric flows of fresh water out of the delta watershed. Predation on these listed fish by striped bass is minimal and not a significant factor in their demise as has been recently suggested.

This year, on the American River, we witnessed an amazing return of 2-year class 'king salmon' (Thousands of fish) to the Fair Oaks Bridge. This was the result of A) the CA. Dept of Fish and Game's decision to plant 2 million salmon smolts at a boat launch adjacent to the aforementioned bridge 2 years ago and B) the fact that last winter, we had record snow pack and rainfall which kept our rivers flowing at significantly-higher-than-average levels (3,000-6,000 CFS) during fall of 2011 salmon returns.

During the prior three years, the central valley witnessed drought conditions and the American River flowed at (1,000-1500 CFS). Coincidentally, the American River hosted quite meager salmon returns during those three years.

Even a layperson with no biological background can look at this actual evidence and draw the rightful conclusion that salmon returns are more directly affected by water availability than by predation.

Simply put... Fish need water to maintain healthy populations.

Stewart Resnick is using his affluence and influence to pay off Feinstein, Brown, and other politicians to protect his financial interest in selling and profiteering from MY, YOUR, OUR PUBLIC TRUST RESOURCES = water, fish, birds, scenic beauty, soil, plants, and all constituent pieces of the wonderful and life-sustaining Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta Ecosystem.

This is absolutely unethical and goes counter to Public Trust Doctrine legislation which seeks to protect that which belongs to everyone and yet no one.

His push for legislation to help eradicate striped bass, is merely a tactic to sidestep any responsibility of environmental and social responsibility.

Here is a well-documented video series on the topic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h8sAv0pQJU

PLEASE educate yourself about this very corrupt plan to misallocate public trust resources which would ultimately lead to the demise of our natural resources.

Mark Lynn

Tony Buzolich
12-06-2011, 02:20 PM
I just watched all four parts of this video and all I can say "Wow". Wow with amazement as to all the complex interactions of the water system and wow with disgust as to the corruptness of these corporate water barons and their ties with our political representatives.

I hope everyone out there takes the time to watch this entire video. Striped bass don't even make a dent into the REAL problem that's killing the delta and the salmon.
TONY