PDA

View Full Version : This is what Westlands does, Kesterson all over again.



Mike McKenzie
11-10-2011, 10:12 AM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 9, 2011
Contacts: Zeke Grader, 415-606-5140 [PCFFA]
Bill Jennings, 209-464-5067 [CSPA]
Steve Evans 916-708-3155 [FOR]
Larry Collins 415-279-1894 [CBOA]
Felix Smith 916-966-2081 [Retired USFWS Biologist]
Steve Volker, 510-496-0600 [Plaintiffs Attorney]
B-Roll Available: http://vimeo.com/31615388
Fishing and Conservation Groups Sue
To Protect Bay-Delta Estuary from Toxic Agricultural Wastewater
San Francisco California – Fishing and conservation groups today filed suit in federal court under the Clean Water Act to stop the continuing unlawful discharges of agricultural wastewater into the San Joaquin River and San Francisco Bay-Delta. The move represents the latest salvo in a decades-long battle to stop Western San Joaquin Valley agribusinesses from sending their toxic wastewater to downstream users, harming drinking water supplies, wildlife, fisheries, and farming.
“This legal action is necessary to enforce the Clean Water Act’s mandate that the Nation’s waters be both swimmable and fishable,” stated Steve Evans of Friends of the River. “The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency decision of March 17, sanctioning these selenium discharges for another 10 years, even as they continue to exceed water-quality standards, demands that citizens file suit to enforce the law.”
Chemicals in the agricultural wastewater, created by irrigating the soils of the Western San Joaquin Valley, which are laced with contaminants, have been found throughout the waterways downstream of the polluters, including at the intakes for public drinking water supplies for millions of Californians.
“The toxic wastes discharged by agribusiness into the San Joaquin River routinely exceed water quality standards and recent science demonstrates that these existing standards are insufficiently protective of health and the environment,” said Bill Jennings, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance. “Failure to enforce standards is equivalent to no standards and posted warning signs along the river are an unacceptable substitute for compliance. It’s unfortunate that citizens have to step in and enforce the law, but the San Joaquin River will never be restored if we don’t control these discharges of toxic wastes.”
Selenium, the most infamous of the pollutants in question, is a highly toxic substance that contaminates the soils of hundreds of thousands of acres of the Western San Joaquin Valley. When these soils are irrigated, selenium leaches into ground and surface waters, where it is well known to accumulate and magnify in the food web as fish and wildlife feed on the toxins. High levels of selenium cause reproductive failure, increased predation, death, and deformities in fish and wildlife. The toxin also threatens human health.
“It’s been nearly three decades since I held the first deformed chick in my hands,” recalled Felix Smith, a retired United States Fish and Wildlife biologist who documented the selenium waterfowl deformities at Kesterson National Wildlife Refuge and is a party to the notice letter. “Since that time I have seen state and federal water officials buckle under the political pressure and look the other way, as they refused to enforce the law to halt these poisonous discharges. Their continuing failure to act threatens to create Kesterson II, unless people wake up and demand that water quality officials enforce the law.”
“Dumping the same kind of toxic wastewater that caused the Kesterson disaster into our waterways doesn’t just threaten drinking supplies and the reproduction of salmon, steelhead, sturgeon, crab and other fish – it threatens jobs.” explained Zeke Grader of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations. “When the fish and crabs stop reproducing, that jeopardizes the thousands of jobs, tens of millions of pounds of seafood production, and billions of dollars of economic activity dependent on the resources provided by a healthy Bay-Delta.”
Despite this history of disaster, only 100,000 acres of toxic farmland have been retired. Taxpayer-subsidized irrigation continues on nearly 400,000 acres of selenium-contaminated soils. Worse, State and Federal officials have looked the other way for decades and refused to enforce water pollution control standards that restrict the discharge of selenium and other toxins into the San Joaquin River and other tributaries of the Bay-Delta.
“It is the Bay-Delta Estuary double whammy,” explained Larry Collins, Crab Boat Owners Association. “The irrigators want to crank up the pumping to divert fresh water, while at the same time increasing the poison dumped back into the San Joaquin River and Bay-Delta Estuary.” The federal government has documented that the continued irrigation, coupled with the irrigators’ refusal to remove this contaminant before discharging it to ground and surface waters, is causing the selenium contamination of groundwater and surface water to spread.
“The San Joaquin River and its tributaries, like Mud Slough, are a public resource, not a de facto drain to be used by these polluters to transfer their pollution to others,” stated Stephan Volker, attorney for the plaintiff groups. “The Clean Water Act demands that our water quality and aquatic life be protected and the polluters be held to account for their pollution.”

Full story here: http://calsport.org/news/lawsuit-filed-to-stop-toxic-discharges-to-san-joaquin-river/

The Pictures ain't for the faint of heart! If this is happening to waterfowl embryos it begs the question what's happening to the rest of the ecosystem including folks that drink the water in the Bay Area and Santa Clara County as well as Southern CA???

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/stripermike/PanocheReuseAreaDeformedEmbryos.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/stripermike/Deformedembryo2.jpg

Mike

huntindog
11-10-2011, 02:19 PM
but i hear you can pay them (and their partner in redding) a substantial sum of money to fish their blue ribbon water (that they want to flood)...i am sure they are all really good guys though..

Darian
11-14-2011, 03:13 PM
If understand the situation correctly, Westlands still owes approximately $345 Million in outstanding, past due loans to USBR yet received water at a rate discounted below the current contract price from USBR due to the surplus water in reservoirs ($8.00 per acre foot reported in the SacBee earlier) during this year. All the time Westlands members received substantial direct cash payment subsidies from USDA for growing cotton on the west side of the SJ valley....

On top of all of that, Westlands offered to construct a solution to the drainage problem that they deny they're responsible for if:

1) USBR would forgive the amount of the unpaid, delinquent loan, and

2) Would be granted ownership of the water behind San Luis Dam and that portion of the facilities owned by the Feds downstream (Forebay).

Scary part is that the latest review of the federal farm bill is in committee in the US Senate. Probably more to it than I read about but this seems like more than enough to make one wonder what growers down there would do without subsidies and favors from those in positions of political power.... :confused:

Mike McKenzie
11-21-2011, 03:22 PM
...Here's a good place go and type Westlands Irrigation District in the "Find Something" window down on the left side of the page
http://www.ewg.org/

Here's a page you can go to and find out who got how much for what and when they got it.
http://farm.ewg.org/pdf/california-farm.pdf

Mike