PDA

View Full Version : Spring Chinook Salmon 'Rescued' from Butte Creek



Mrs.Finsallaround
07-19-2010, 10:04 AM
Received this via NCCFFF :thumbsup::

Spring Chinook Salmon 'Rescued' from Butte Creek
by Dan Bacher

State and federal fisheries staff arrived at Butte Creek on Thursday, July 15, expecting to capture and transport 75-80 spring run Chinook salmon stranded in the tributary of the Sacramento River, but they actually captured and relocated 123 of these majestic native fish.

This "rescue" has become an annual ritual that takes place when these salmon are threatened by rising water temperatures during their annual migration. Over the past decade, two major fish kills took place on the creek, due to mismanagement by the state and federal governments and PG&E.

Fishermen and environmentalists pointed out that the warm water temperatures that every summer plague the creek are spurred by upstream diversions - and that the agency staff had waited too long to "rescue" the fish for their efforts to be successful.

"The salmon, which are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, had stopped their migratory journey through the lower reach of the river because of rising water temperatures," according to a news release from the DFG. "The Department of Fish and Game (DFG) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) combined efforts to rescue the fish."

Staff netted the salmon, implanted radio transmitters in 22 of them and moved them upstream to cooler water, so they can continue their spawning migration.

"Due to the extremely low number of returning fish this year to Butte Creek, every fish is important," said Joe Johnson, DFG Fisheries Supervisor. "We didn't expect to find 123 fish, but we were prepared. We tagged all of them and place radio transmitters in two groups of fish in two areas. We want to find out how many of these stranded salmon will survive to spawn, and what the results are for this type of rescue."

Snorkel surveys conducted at the end of June only recorded 300 salmon in this area, instead of an expected 3,000 to 5,000. "A variety of factors may have delayed or altered the normal migration timing and pattern, including a late spring and cold high flows out of the Yuba River," Johnson said.

"The water in the Butte Creek pool where the fish were stranded is significantly warmer than the rest of the river, creating a thermal block that causes the migrating salmon to dive to the bottom in search of cooler waters," the release continued. "As long as the water remains warm, the fish will not move forward. This particular spot on the river has been a trouble spot for spring run salmon in previous years."

While the DFG staff claimed this was a "successful" rescue, Allen Harthorn, executive director of Friends of Butte Creek, disagrees.

"It is amazing how they can act like this is a success when they ultimately lose almost all the rescued fish because they waited too long," said Harthorn.

He also emphasized that the warm water temperatures requiring the rescue were spurred by upstream agricultural water diversions.

"There are two agricultural diverters upstream," said Harthorn, "and the DFG also diverts water for wildlife refuges at the upper dam. Eighty percent of the water is being taken out upstream. Does anyone think that might be related to the warmer water temperatures? This is getting to be ridiculous."

The DFG staff and NOAA biologists set seine nets to capture the stranded salmon. Biologists then used dip nets to capture fish out of the larger seine net and place them in a net pen.

Each fish, some of whom weighed up to 30 pounds, was carefully moved from the net pen in dip nets by a line of workers to transfer the fish up a steep bank. The fish were then loaded into a hatchery truck and transported up river for release, thus moving them around the warm water thermal block.

This year, for the second time, DFG, NOAA and staff from the University of California, Davis implanted a percentage of the rescued salmon with radio tracking devices, while the rest were tagged with small, external colored tags. The trackers will enable biologists to monitor how rescued fish behave after being rescued and if they contribute to the overall salmon population.

"Butte Creek's spring run Chinook salmon have been listed as a threatened species since 1999," according to the DFG. "More than $35 million has been spent by state, federal and private parties on restoration and recovery efforts on the watershed. Over the past decade, changes in habitat and water management have helped the population rebound somewhat, but Central Valley salmon populations can still vary significantly from year to year."

The DFG noted that the run has averaged 6,000 fish over the past 10 years, "but recent surveys indicate a much lower salmon return."

"We have a very small run so far on Butte Creek," added Harthorn. "It looks like it will be less than last year's precipitous drop from 11,000 in '08 to 2561 in '09. The trend does not look good."

The "rescue" of stranded spring chinook salmon on Butte Creek occurs as populations of Central Valley steelhead, Sacramento River chinook salmon, Delta smelt, longfin smelt and striped bass continue to collapse. Although water pollution, invasive species, toxic chemicals and other factors play a role in the collapse, the most significant factor in the decline of these species is massive exports of water from the California Delta to corporate agribusiness and southern California.

Meanwhile, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Legislative leadership, corporate agribusiness and southern California water agencies are pushing for the construction of the peripheral canal and new dams. The peripheral canal, a $23 to $53.8 billion government boondoggle, is likely to result in the extinction of Central Valley Chinook salmon, Delta smelt and other species.

Spring-run Chinook Symposium Set for July 22 to 23 in Chico

The Salmonid Restoration Federation is hosting the 5th Annual Spring-run Chinook symposium July 22-23 in Chico, California. This is a truly collaborative educational event with diverse symposium partners including Friends of Butte Creek, Pacific Gas & Electric, Department of Water Resources, and Big Chico Creek Watershed Alliance.

“Spring Run Salmon are in serious decline in California, now is the time to learn about the problems, and make commitments to restoration. The fish can’t wait,” said Executive Director of Friends of Butte Creek, Allen Harthorn.

SRF is pleased to offer this opportunity for local landowners, restorationists, fisheries biologists and agency staff to participate in the Chinook Symposium which includes field tours and presentations on problems and solutions specific to Spring-run Chinook. The Spring-run Chinook Symposium offers restoration practitioners training and networking opportunities on issues affecting California’s threatened Spring-run Chinook populations.

Thursday tours will include a tour of Upper Butte Creek Salmonid Habitat, Hydroelectric Influences and the Butte Creek Ecological Preserve, a tour of the Lower Feather River including Oroville Dam Visitor’s Center and Department of Water Resources Projects, and a Big Chico Creek Tour of Salmonid Restoration Projects.

Thursday evening SRF will host a dinner social with symposium keynote speaker PhD. Lisa Thompson from UC Davis and UC Cooperative Extension who will give a presentation, “Wilderness First Aid: Stabilizing Spring-run Chinook Populations While We Work Toward Recovery.”

Friday Tours will include a Lower Butte Creek tour beginning at Durham Mutual Dam where spring run Chinook have been stranded for the last three years, a drive by on two other dams and on to the site of the Western Canal Siphon Project, where four dams were removed.

After lunch they will visit the Weir 2 in the Sutter Bypass that is scheduled to be retrofitted by the Department of Water Resources. Chris Mosser, a graduate student from UC Davis will give a presentation regarding Monitoring of Rescued Salmon in Lower Butte Creek. The Willow Slough restoration project, which is currently under construction near the mouth of Butte Creek in the Sutter Bypass, will be presented at lunch.

There will also be a tour of Deer Creek and Mill Creek Restoration Projects with Holly Savage of the Deer Creek Watershed Conservancy and a representative of The Nature Conservancy. The tour will begin at the Abbey of New Clairvaux and will include a brief overview of the Deer Creek Watershed Conservancy’s goals for salmonids in Deer Creek.

The tour will visit sites proposed for improvements in the Deer Creek Flood Corridor Protection Project. This project will increase floodway width through setback levees and conservation easements to improve flood protection and ecosystem function. Increasing the floodway width in this reach would provide a number of ecological benefits, including increased area for channel migration, ability for natural sediment transport and deposition that improves channel complexity without damaging infrastructure, and increased area for riparian vegetation growth while maintaining flood conveyance; greater channel complexity and gravel size diversity via reduced water velocities and shear stress in the reach; more confined low flow channel to improve adult salmonid fish passage and juvenile rearing habitat; and many others.

Partipants will also visit areas in the creek where fish passage has been an issue and discuss the Deer Creek Flow Enhancement Program (DCFEP) where local irrigators provide bypass flows for fish during low flow conditions. The DCFEP is designed to fulfill the water needs of local agriculture and domestic water users while achieving the fisheries flow objectives in Deer Creek and the groundwater protection requirements set forth by the Tehama County AB 3030 Groundwater Management Plan.

wjorg
07-19-2010, 10:10 AM
What does DFG divert water for? What refuge? A duck hunting spot probably? Anybody have any good idea on who to call and harass to get that to stop?

When they remove "the dams on butte creek," will these diversions stop?

Law should allow the cessation of diversion in case of extreme need like this, but oh yeah, the judges probably have stock in agriculture like the judge down south has stock in oil.

huntindog
07-27-2010, 10:34 AM
Water from the parrot phelan diversion dam (Okie dam to us locals) diverts water for agriculture and wetland uses associated with the Llano Seco Ranch as well as the llano seco refuges (state and federal). The second dam which is downstream from parrot phelan is the durham mutual dam. They divert water for numerous ag uses and one illegal diversion of water for a waterski park (that for $ome rea$on no-one will do anything about).

I do not know if water diverted this time of year is used in the refuges. Each of these refuges also has wells drilled and other sac river water sources so they have the capabilities to change their water source at various times in the year.

The annual "rescue" is largely a PR event to produce pictures of DFG biologists doing marlin perkins bio stuff the public thinks they should be doing. It is an exercise in futility though.

huntindog
07-27-2010, 10:37 AM
On a good note, original snorkel surveys are proving to be inaccurate and a much larger number of fish are now being identified since the water has receded slightly. Snorkel sureys during higher than normal water conditions can be pretty difficult.

wjorg
07-28-2010, 08:06 AM
Westlands Diversions, Illegal diversions, and DFG/EPA Apathy...

Sounds like a posterchild for whats wrong in the Sac River System.

How could we all bring this more publicity and shame DFG?

How can the illegal waterski park water diversion be spotlighted? Local media?

My friend recently drove back from SOCal. He says "there is no more desert along I5." I havent seen it myself. But, what he pointed out was the signs saying "Another Congress Mandated Dustbowl." This is in a former desert.

Scott V
07-28-2010, 10:05 AM
The annual "rescue" is largely a PR event to produce pictures of DFG biologists doing marlin perkins bio stuff the public thinks they should be doing.

Marlin Perkins always stayed in the jeep and made Jim do all the work. Boy do I miss that show. I can still hear the tune of "Mutual of Omaha" in my head.:D

Dustin Revel
08-08-2010, 12:54 PM
has a study been done to see if these salmon would be better off left in the downstream hole? survival may be higher?
35 million dollars could buy quite a bit of water and may have been better spent that way in terms of restoration effect.
i lose respect for ca dfg with every "rescue" article i read

oregonsteel
08-08-2010, 02:24 PM
Boy do I miss that show. I can still hear the tune of "Mutual of Omaha" in my head.:D

Are you sure?? Because I also still hear it in my head, but it is not "Mutal of Omaha... " but "mutual of Omaha's ... wild kingdom

In other words my voice doesnt say Omaha but instead says Omaha's :D

Darrin.Deel
08-08-2010, 03:42 PM
dustin- the water down below highway 99 is way too warm and too rocky for effective spawning.

on another note, one of the reasons it becomes so warm is the de sabla PG&e resivior

huntindog
08-08-2010, 08:56 PM
has a study been done to see if these salmon would be better off left in the downstream hole? survival may be higher?
35 million dollars could buy quite a bit of water and may have been better spent that way in terms of restoration effect.
i lose respect for ca dfg with every "rescue" article i read

water temps down that low reach critical level in early summer...any fish left down there would be crawdad food.

Dustin Revel
08-09-2010, 06:18 PM
is there a barrier that prevents them from going upstream other than hot water?

Darrin.Deel
08-09-2010, 06:59 PM
not without a fish ladder until they reach de sabla (brooks, correct me if I am wrong)

huntindog
08-10-2010, 06:54 AM
the fish have pretty easy passage all the way to desabla. There were numerous dams that use to be a nightmare for the fish to get through. Many of the dams were removed and the ones that are still in place have been retrofitted with new, very passable, fish ladders. The fish in the hole below 99 where the rescue occurred just choose to stay there for some reason. No-one can figure it out. It is not even a very deep hole, but for unknown reasons every year a few fish stay there. Ultimately these fish are doomed, regardless if they are rescued or not. Still i understand why they feel the need to try.

Covelo
08-10-2010, 10:14 AM
Just drove to So Cal down I5. Very little non-tilled land all the way to the Grapevine. Lots of signs blaming Congress for the "dust bowl", specifically singling out Boxer, Pelosi, and Costa. Seems political as I cannot think of anything Congress has done with regards to water lately.

As for the rescued fish, seems like it is time to let those genes be removed from the population. Rescuing those fish just perpetuates the likelihood that fish will continue to stage there. There are better ways to spend the resources unless they are going to address the water temp issues.

Darian
08-10-2010, 01:14 PM
Hey Covelo,.... Like you, I recently drove to L.A. on Hwy 99 and a bit earlier on I-5. Almost all available acreage is under cultivation/irrigation. Those signs are becoming a pain in the arse, to me. Perhaps the singling out of members of Congress is based more on what they haven't done (for big Ag interests) as much as what they have.... Of course, either way, I don't think much of the current crop from either party or the prospects for the candidates on the horizon.... :confused:

Where were the growers who posted those signs when they were creating dust clouds from ploughing that drifted over I-5 causing some major traffic accidents let alone traffic jams.... :\\

Sorry to be so cynical. :(

oregonsteel
08-10-2010, 10:37 PM
Hey Covelo,.... Like you, I recently drove to L.A. on Hwy 99 and a bit earlier on I-5. Almost all available acreage is under cultivation/irrigation. Those signs are becoming a pain in the arse, to me. Perhaps the singling out of members of Congress is based more on what they haven't done (for big Ag interests) as much as what they have.... Of course, either way, I don't think much of the current crop from either party or the prospects for the candidates on the horizon.... :confused:

Where were the growers who posted those signs when they were creating dust clouds from ploughing that drifted over I-5 causing some major traffic accidents let alone traffic jams.... :\\

Sorry to be so cynical. :(

I wonder how many of these signs are put up by ag who buy water for pennies on the dollar (subsidized by taxpayers) THEN resell the water back to taxpayers at full cost? Good to be a millionaire on government welfare

Darian
08-10-2010, 11:11 PM
Uhhhhh,..... All of 'em.... :question: :question: