PDA

View Full Version : Record Low Salmon Counts



inclinejj
02-18-2009, 03:20 PM
AP Newsbreak: Record-low chinook salmon returns


By JASON DEAREN, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, February 18, 2009




(02-18) 11:55 PST San Francisco, CA (AP) --
A record-low number of chinook salmon returned to California's Central Valley last year, indicating that severe restrictions on salmon fishing are again likely this year, federal regulators said.





The Pacific Fishery Management Council reported that in 2008, a total of 66,264 natural and hatchery fall chinook or "king" salmon adults were estimated to have returned to the Sacramento River basin for spawning, the lowest estimate on record.
The council uses the estimates to determine if it should recommend limits on commercial and recreational fishing.
"Our team is putting together the forecast this week, will come out some time next week," said Chuck Tracy, the salmon staff officer for the council. The final recommendation on fishing limits will be made in April.
The numbers are down from about 90,000 in 2007, which led to bans in 2008 on commercial and recreational fishing of salmon off the California coast and most of Oregon.
The sharp drop in the king salmon that swim from the Pacific Ocean through San Francisco Bay to spawn in the Sacramento River and its tributaries last fall is part of broader decline in wild salmon runs in rivers across the West in recent years.
In the Sacramento Delta, fishermen and regulators believe large pumps used to move water around for farming and other uses is to blame for the falling numbers. Others say changes in the ocean due to greenhouse gas pollution are also killing the fish.
Tracy said returns in the Klamath River, the next big salmon spawning river north of the Sacramento, while seeing an overall rise in salmon returns, saw fewer than regulators had estimated.
Still, the low numbers do not come as a shock to regulators or fishermen, who were expecting this year to be tough for commercial fisherman.
"Realistically, we were looking at the fact that we wouldn't have a season this year. We're looking at 2010 before we can fish again," said Zeke Grader, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, and industry group.
Grader said the fishermen's association has saved millions of dollars in federal assistance fishermen received after the stunning collapse of the Pacific Coast salmon industry.
"We very sparingly used that disaster money from last year figuring we'd need it this year," Grader said. "That money sitting in the account will be distributed to keep people alive for this year."

Darrin.Deel
02-18-2009, 07:10 PM
California is a joke...

wjorg
02-18-2009, 09:58 PM
...but nothing to joke about. Its serious.

Tony Buzolich
02-18-2009, 11:36 PM
I just watched a show on Animal Planet titled "Squid Invasion" and without any doubt these Humbolt squid have invaded our Pacific coast in horrendous numbers. They used to be localized in certain areas of the warmer oceans but now have spread prolifically from Chile to Alaska. This never used to be.

They spawn by the millions at a time and can go from a single cell to a swimming animal in four days and be the size of an adult human in a year.

What's really scary is that they attack and eat just about anything and everything including salmon. On one scene the show interviewed a fisherman out of Half Moon Bay as he said that there are NO more salmon, and almost No more rockfish either because of the predation of these squid.

With the global warming and the sea temps rising everywhere it's no wonder animal life is changing. And with a very fast reproducing animal like these Humbolt squid that like the warmer water, it's no suprise that they just might be affecting our salmon populations more than we realize.

Just some food for thought. Try and watch this show if it repeats on Animal Planet.

David Lee
02-19-2009, 09:38 AM
Hi Tony .

I was involved in a thread on Dan Blanton's board last month on the same subject ...

http://www.danblanton.com/viewarchive.php?id=115724&archivefile=/arch200901.php

While someone mentioned that surveys found no Salmon in Humboldt Squid stomach samples , logic would dictate that a large predator like the H.S. can and will eat ANYTHING available . Because it hasn't been documented yet does not mean it isn't happening .

Again .... basic logic - take .... say , an African Lion . Take a Lion who eats Zebra (just an example) , move the Lion out of his natural range (better yet , increase the Lion population) , and see what it WON'T eat .

I've heard that the Humbold Squid are full of different parasites . This could limit their commerical use ?? I'd imagine that they are tasty .... but cutting around the worms could make them a bit difficult to sell for food .

Too bad the Squid don't eat Seals/Sea Lions ........

David